Continuous exercise training significantly improved early heart rate recovery (from 15±9 to 24±12 bpm, P=0.02) in patients with chronic heart failure, whereas interval training did not.
RCT (n=29)
randomly assigned
p-value: p=0.02
BACKGROUND: Heart rate recovery (HRR1) immediately after exercise reflects parasympathetic activity, which is markedly attenuated in chronic heart failure (CHF) patients. The aim of our study was to examine both continuous and interval exercise training effects on HRR1 in these patients. DESIGN: The population study consisted of 29 stable CHF patients that participated at a rehabilitation program of 36 sessions, three times per week. Of the 29 patients, 24 completed the program. Patients were randomly assigned to interval n=10 100% peak work rate (WRp) for 30 s, alternating with rest for 30 s and to continuous training n=14 (50%WRp). METHODS: All patients performed a symptom-limited cardiopulmonary exercise test on a cycle ergometer before and after the completion of the program. Measurements included peak oxygen uptake (VO2p), anaerobic threshold (AT), WRp, first degree slope of VO2 during the first minute of recovery (VO2/t-slope), chronotropic response % chronotropic reserve (CR) = (peak HR - resting HR) x100/ (220 - age - resting HR), HRR1 (HR difference from peak exercise to one minute after). RESULTS: After the completion of the rehabilitation program there was a significant increase of WRp, VO2p, AT and VO2/t-slope (by 30%, P=0. 01; 6%, P=0. 01; 10%, P=0. 02; and 27%, P=0. 03 respectively for continuous training and by 21%, P<0. 05; 8%, P=0. 01; 6%, P=NS; and 48%, P=0. 02 respectively for interval training). However, only patients exercised under the continuous training regime had a significant increase in HRR1 (15. 0+/-9. 0 to 24. 0+/-12 bpm; P=0. 02) and CR (57+/-19 to 72+/-21%, P=0. 02), in contrast with those assigned to interval training (HRR1: 21+/-11 to 21+/-8 bpm; P=NS and CR: 57+/-18 to 59+/-21%, P=NS). CONCLUSIONS: Both continuous and interval exercise training program improves exercise capacity in CHF patients. However, continuous rather than interval exercise training improves early HRR1, a marker of parasympathetic activity, suggesting a greater contribution to the autonomic nervous system.
Dimopoulos et al. (Wed,) conducted a rct in chronic heart failure (n=29). Continuous exercise training vs. Interval exercise training (100% peak work rate for 30s alternating with 30s rest) was evaluated on Heart rate recovery at one minute (HRR1) (p=0.02). Continuous exercise training significantly improved early heart rate recovery (from 15±9 to 24±12 bpm, P=0.02) in patients with chronic heart failure, whereas interval training did not.