Key result
Misdiagnosis of von Willebrand disease remains prevalent due to clinical and laboratory pitfalls, which can be mitigated through standardized bleeding assessment tools and comprehensive testing.
Why the study?
Despite being the most common inherited bleeding disorder, accurate diagnosis of von Willebrand disease is frequently shrouded by diagnostic pitfalls, under-diagnosis, over-diagnosis, and misdiagnosis.
Accurate diagnosis of von Willebrand disease requires coalescing clinical history with standardized bleeding assessment tools and comprehensive laboratory testing to avoid prevalent misdiagnosis.
May aid VWD diagnostic accuracy via BAT and algorithms; leaves open prospective validation of error reduction.
Despite von Willebrand disease (VWD) being the most common inherited bleeding disorder, its accurate diagnosis is frequently shrouded by diagnostic pitfalls. VWD is frequently under-diagnosed, over-diagnosed and misdiagnosed, leading to significant avoidable patient morbidity and health care system burden. At the heart of this dilemma lies the heterogeneity and complexity of von Willebrand factor (VWF) and associated defects, and the necessity of coalescing clinical and laboratory features to obtain an accurate diagnosis. Common pitfalls include poor clinical and scientific understanding and familiarity with VWD, incomplete clinical history and lack of routine use of standardised bleeding assessment tools (BAT), difficulty in accessing a comprehensive repertoire of laboratory tests, significant pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical issues, and lack of expertise in laboratory testing and interpretation. Errors, resulting in under-diagnosis, over-diagnosis, and misdiagnosis of VWD, are presented and discussed. Strategies to minimise errors include better education of clinicians and laboratory staff on VWD, routine use of validated BAT, utilising a comprehensive gamut of laboratory investigations according to a standardised algorithm, and repeating testing to minimise pre-analytical errors. Recommendations on appropriate patient selection for VWD testing, how VWD should be investigated in the laboratory, and how to ensure test results are accurately interpreted in the correct clinical context are detailed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Colonne et al. (2021) conducted a review in von Willebrand disease (VWD). Misdiagnosis of von Willebrand disease remains prevalent due to clinical and laboratory pitfalls, which can be mitigated through standardized bleeding assessment tools and comprehensive testing.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: