Key result
A Functional Movement Screen score of ≤14 did not significantly predict noncontact injury incidence in male soccer players compared to scores >14 (OR 0.63; 95% CI 0.19-2.07; p=0.45).
Why the study?
Does a Functional Movement Screen (FMS) score of 14 or below predict noncontact injury in adult male soccer players?
Cohort (n=89)
Yes
Does a Functional Movement Screen (FMS) score of 14 or below predict noncontact injury in adult male soccer players?
The Functional Movement Screen (FMS) composite score does not accurately predict noncontact injury incidence rates in male semiprofessional soccer players.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
FMS ≤14 does not predict noncontact injury in semiprofessional soccer; should not yet change screening practice and leaves utility open in other cohorts.
Smith, PD, and Hanlon, D. Assessing the effectiveness of the functional movement screen in predicting noncontact injury rates in soccer players. J Strength Cond Res 31(12): 3327-3332, 2017-This study assessed if the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) can accurately predict noncontact injury in adult soccer players when normalizing noncontact injury occurrence against match exposure levels. Senior male players (n = 89) from 5 League of Ireland semiprofessional clubs participated in the study (mean age = 23.2 ± 4.4 years; mean height = 179.5 ± 6.6 cm; mean body mass = 77.5 ± 7.8 kg). Participants performed the FMS during preseason, and their injury occurrence rates and match minutes were tracked throughout 1 season. In total, 66 noncontact injuries were recorded. No significant difference was found in FMS composite scores between players receiving noncontact injuries and players not suffering a noncontact injury (p = 0.96). There was no significant difference in exposure-normalized noncontact injury incidence between those scoring 14 or below and those scoring above 14 on the FMS (0.36 vs. 0.29 non-contact injuries per player per 1,000 match minutes). Players scoring 14 or below on the FMS had an odds ratio of 0.63 (p = 0.45; 95% CI = 0.19-2.07) of receiving a noncontact injury. Despite previous research showing links between low FMS composite scores and subsequent injury, these results suggest that the FMS cannot accurately predict a male soccer player's likelihood of receiving a noncontact injury and that a lower FMS composite score does not significantly increase their noncontact injury incidence rate per 1,000 match minutes. Caution should therefore be used when using the FMS as a predictor of noncontact injury, and pain prevalence during the FMS, previous injuries, and training/match exposure levels should also be taken into account.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smith et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Noncontact injury (n=89). Functional Movement Screen (FMS) score ≤ 14 vs. FMS score > 14 was evaluated on Exposure-normalized noncontact injury incidence (injuries per player per 1,000 match minutes) (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.19-2.07, p=0.45). A Functional Movement Screen score of ≤14 did not significantly predict noncontact injury incidence in male soccer players compared to scores >14 (OR 0.63; 95% CI 0.19-2.07; p=0.45).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: