Key result
Functional Movement Screen composite score of 15 or lower fails to predict overall injury risk.
Why the study?
The study aimed to assess the reliability of the Functional Movement Screen and explore whether it can predict personal injury risk in Japanese soccer players.
Does the Functional Movement Screen predict injury risk in Japanese college soccer players?
Cohort (n=75)
No
Does the Functional Movement Screen predict injury risk in Japanese college soccer players?
Odds Ratio: 1.81 (95% CI 0.61–5.39)
p-value: p=0.29
The Functional Movement Screen does not have sufficient sensitivity and specificity for predicting injuries in Japanese college soccer players.
FMS lacks predictive value for injury in college soccer; leaves open need for alternative validated screens in prospective athlete cohorts.
[Purpose] This study aimed to assess the reliability of the Functional Movement Screen and explore whether this evaluation tool can predict the risks of personal injuries in Japanese soccer players. [Participants and Methods] Seventy-five Japanese college soccer players who participated in our 1 year prospective cohort study underwent a Functional Movement Screen assessment. Demographic data, athletic characteristics, and types and frequency of injuries sustained, were analyzed with the assessment results. [Results] There was no significant difference in the mean Functional Movement Screen composite scores between genders. Although the Functional Movement Screen showed excellent inter-rater reliability (0.92), low overall internal consistency (0.35) was observed. A maximum score of 3 in straight leg raise occurred in 94% of the females and was considered a ceiling effect. None of the cut-off point scores of the Functional Movement Screen were associated with the number of overall injuries, lower limb injuries, and traumatic injuries, or time to return to play. The Functional Movement Screen composite score of ≤15 represented the maximum sensitivity of 76.92% and specificity of 34.78% with 0.56 in the area under the curve. [Conclusion] Functional Movement Screen composite scores do not have sufficient sensitivity and specificity for predicting injuries in Japanese college soccer players.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miyamori et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Injury risk in soccer players (n=75). Functional Movement Screen (FMS) composite score ≤15 vs. FMS composite score >15 was evaluated on Number of overall injuries (OR 1.81, 95% CI 0.61-5.39, p=0.29). A Functional Movement Screen composite score of ≤15 did not significantly predict the risk of overall injuries in Japanese college soccer players (OR 1.81, 95% CI 0.61-5.39, AUC 0.56).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: