Key result
The developed MALDI-TOF NAMS assay simultaneously identified 14 porcine viruses with an overall compliance rate of 97.88% compared to qPCR across 108 clinical samples.
Why the study?
Porcine respiratory and digestive diseases often involve mixed infections, but current detection methods have limitations in simultaneously identifying multiple pathogens.
Does MALDI-TOF NAMS accurately detect and distinguish multiple porcine viruses compared to qPCR?
Does MALDI-TOF NAMS accurately detect and distinguish multiple porcine viruses compared to qPCR?
MALDI-TOF NAMS is a highly sensitive and reliable tool for the simultaneous detection of multiple porcine viruses.
May improve multiplex detection of porcine viruses; leaves open clinical validation before routine adoption.
Background: Porcine respiratory and digestive diseases pose significant challenges in modern pig farming, often arising from mixed infections involving various pathogens. Current methods for detecting viral porcine pathogens have notable limitations in simultaneously identifying multiple pathogens. To address this issue, our study introduces a novel methodology that combines single-base extension PCR with matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight nucleic acid mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF NAMS). Results: Our approach accurately simultaneously identified 14 critical porcine viruses, including porcine circovirus types 1 to 3, porcine bocaviruses groups 1 to 3, African swine fever virus, pseudorabies virus, porcine parvovirus, torque teno sus virus, swine influenza virus, porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus, classical swine fever virus, and foot-and-mouth disease virus. The low limit of detection for multiplex identification ranges from 13.54 to 1.59 copies/μL. Inter- and intra-assay stability was found to be ≥98.3%. In a comprehensive analysis of 108 samples, the assay exhibited an overall compliance with qPCR results of 97.88%. Conclusions: The developed MALDI-TOF NAMS assay exhibits high sensitivity, specificity, and reliability in detecting and distinguishing a wide spectrum of porcine viruses in complex matrix samples. This underscores its potential as an efficient diagnostic tool for disease surveillance and control in the pig industry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shuai et al. (2023) studied Porcine viral infections (n=108). MALDI-TOF NAMS vs. qPCR was evaluated on Overall compliance with qPCR results. The developed MALDI-TOF NAMS assay simultaneously identified 14 porcine viruses with an overall compliance rate of 97.88% compared to qPCR across 108 clinical samples.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: