Key result
A novel competitive ELISA using PCV2 virus-like particles demonstrated 96.5% sensitivity and 96.0% specificity for differentiating PCV2 antibodies from PCV1/PCV2 mixtures in pig sera.
Why the study?
Does a competitive ELISA accurately differentiate PCV2 antibodies from PCV1/PCV2 mixtures in pig sera?
Does a competitive ELISA accurately differentiate PCV2 antibodies from PCV1/PCV2 mixtures in pig sera?
A newly developed competitive ELISA can sensitively and specifically differentiate PCV2 antibodies from PCV1/PCV2 mixtures in pig sera, facilitating large-scale monitoring.
May aid PCV2 serosurveillance in swine; leaves open routine diagnostic adoption pending field validation.
BACKGROUND: Porcine cirovirus type 1 (PCV1) and type 2 (PCV2) are circulating in Chinese pig herds and the infected pigs develop antibodies to both viruses. Current commercial available ELISA kits cannot differentiate PCV2-specific antibodies from the mixtures of PCV1 and PCV2 antibodies in PCV1/2-infected or PCV2-vaccinated pigs. Therefore, the need for developing PCV2-specific ELISA methods is urgent to evaluate PCV2 antibody level in exclusion of PCV1 antibody interference after PCV2 vaccination. RESULTS: Virus-like particles (VLPs) of PCV2 based on the recombinant Cap protein were expressed in Escherichia coli. A competing ELISA was established by using the VLPs as coating antigen and a PCV2-specific monoclonal antibody as the competing antibody. The competing ELISA was compared with the results obtained by using an immunoperoxidase monolayer assay on 160 serum samples. The sensitivity and specificity of this competing ELISA were determined as 96.5 and 96.0 %, at 2 standard deviation from the mean or 91.8 and 100 % at 3 standard deviations from the mean. Next, a serological survey of 1297 vaccinated serum samples collected from commercial pig herds in Beijing, Hunan and Henan provinces in China was conducted. The results showed that 85.9 % of sera having positive PCV2 antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: The competing ELISA we developed in this study was both sensitive and specific to PCV2 and was suitable for large-scale PCV2 antibody monitoring in exclusion of PCV1 antibody interference after PCV2 vaccination.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Han et al. (2016) studied Porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) antibodies (n=1,457). Competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA) vs. Immunoperoxidase monolayer assay (IPMA) was evaluated on Sensitivity and specificity of cELISA for detecting PCV2 antibodies. A novel competitive ELISA using PCV2 virus-like particles demonstrated 96.5% sensitivity and 96.0% specificity for differentiating PCV2 antibodies from PCV1/PCV2 mixtures in pig sera.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: