Key result
The proposed MEMS bionic hydrophone heart sound sensor demonstrated a signal-to-noise ratio 8.2 dB superior to the 3200-type 3M Littmann stethoscope.
Why the study?
Most contact conduction heart sound sensors suffer from poor signal-to-noise ratio due to acoustic signal attenuation caused by impedance differences between sensor filling materials and human soft tissue.
Mean Difference: 8.2
A novel MEMS bionic hydrophone-based heart sound sensor demonstrates improved signal-to-noise ratio compared to a standard electronic stethoscope.
Fluid immersion may reduce heart sound attenuation; leaves open clinical SNR gains pending validation.
Since most of the contact conduction type of heart sound sensors don’t take into account the acoustic signal attenuation problem caused by the heart sound signal transmitting to a sensor whose filling materials’ impedance is different to human soft tissue, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the heart sound sensors is not very well. Human heart is immersed in blood. If the sensor’s core sensitive element can be immersed in fluid, the attenuation of heart sound signal may be decreased greatly. Inspired by the principle of hydroacoustic signal’s detection, this paper proposes the design of heart sound sensor based on the bionic vector hydrophone. Then theoretical analysis and finite element method (FEM) simulation about the sensor have been carried out. Combined sensitivity with resonant frequency, the optimum dimension of the sensor’s structure has been determined. The sensor’s micro-structure has been fabricated by using Micro-Electro-Mechanical System (MEMS) technology and coupling encapsulated by choosing a kind of medical coupling agent as the filling material. Finally, the performance of the proposed sensor is tested. The fact is that the proposed sensor can work well with either healthy people or patients with heart disease. The obtained data clearly show that: the SNR of the proposed heart sound sensor is superior to 3200-type of 3M Littmann 8.2 dB.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2019) studied Heart disease. MEMS bionic hydrophone heart sound sensor vs. 3200-type of 3M Littmann was evaluated on Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) (8.2 dB difference). The proposed MEMS bionic hydrophone heart sound sensor demonstrated a signal-to-noise ratio 8.2 dB superior to the 3200-type 3M Littmann stethoscope.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: