Key result
Pulmonary vasodilator therapy is being investigated to optimize pulmonary vascular resistance and improve quality of life in patients with single-ventricle physiology and Fontan circulation.
Why the study?
Patients with single-ventricle physiology culminating in Fontan circulation have significant late morbidity and mortality, driving interest in pulmonary vasodilators to optimize pulmonary vascular resistance.
Does pulmonary vasodilator therapy improve outcomes in patients with single-ventricle physiology and Fontan circulation?
Does pulmonary vasodilator therapy improve outcomes in patients with single-ventricle physiology and Fontan circulation?
This review discusses the rationale and evidence for using pulmonary vasodilators to optimize pulmonary vascular resistance in patients with Fontan circulation.
Despite significant improvements in the surgical and postoperative care for patients with single-ventricle physiology culminating in the Fontan circulation, significant late morbidity and mortality remains. In the setting of passive (ie, non-“pump” driven) pulmonary blood flow, pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) plays a key role in determining cardiac output, and even slight elevations in PVR may result in significant morbidity. There is now great interest to treat Fontan patients with pulmonary vasodilators in an attempt to “optimize” PVR (and by extension, quality of life) and/or improve an elevated PVR. This review discusses the hemodynamic implications of the Fontan circulation, the evidence for use of pulmonary vasodilator therapy, and possible target physiologic mechanisms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Handler et al. (2019) conducted a review in Single-ventricle physiology with Fontan circulation. Pulmonary vasodilator therapy was evaluated. Pulmonary vasodilator therapy is being investigated to optimize pulmonary vascular resistance and improve quality of life in patients with single-ventricle physiology and Fontan circulation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: