Key result
Continuous multi antithrombotic therapy during CIED implantation did not increase clinically significant pocket hematomas, whereas valvular heart disease and high HAS-BLED scores were independent predictors of bleeding.
Why the study?
Does continuous multi antithrombotic therapy increase the risk of clinically significant pocket hematomas or thromboembolism in patients undergoing CIED implantations?
Observational (n=300)
No
Does continuous multi antithrombotic therapy increase the risk of clinically significant pocket hematomas or thromboembolism in patients undergoing CIED implantations?
Continuous multi-antithrombotic therapy during CIED implantation appears tolerated, though patients with high HAS-BLED scores or valvular heart disease are at higher risk for clinically significant pocket hematomas.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Continuous multi AT appears tolerable during CIED implantation; leaves open whether high HAS-BLED or VHD warrants interruption.
Previous studies showed that continuous anticoagulation or single antiplatelet therapy during implantations of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) was relatively safe. However, the safety of continuous multi antithrombotic therapy (AT) in patients undergoing CIED interventions has not been clearly defined. We sought to evaluate the safety of this therapy during CIED implantations. A total of 300 consecutive patients (mean 69 years old, 171 males) with CIED implantations were enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into 6 groups [No-AT, oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT), single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT), OAT and SAPT, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), triple AT (TAT)], and the perioperative complications were evaluated. Clinically significant pocket hematomas (PH) were defined as PH needing surgical intervention, prolonged hospitalizations, interruption of AT, or blood product transfusions. There were 129, 89, 49, 20, 10, and 3 patients in No-AT, OAT, SAPT, OAT + SAPT, DAPT, and TAT groups, respectively. The occurrence of clinically significant PH and thromboembolism did not differ among 6 groups (p = 0.145 and p = 0.795, respectively). However, high HAS-BLED score and valvular heart disease (VHD) were associated with clinically significant PH (p = 0.014 and p = 0.015, respectively). Continuous multi AT may be tolerated, but patients with high HAS-BLED score or VHD would require a careful attention during CIED implantations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ishibashi et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Patients undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation (n=300). Continuous multi antithrombotic therapy vs. No antithrombotic therapy or single antithrombotic therapy was evaluated on Clinically significant pocket hematoma (p=0.145). Continuous multi antithrombotic therapy during CIED implantation did not increase clinically significant pocket hematomas, whereas valvular heart disease and high HAS-BLED scores were independent predictors of bleeding.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: