Key result
Serial monitoring during bevacizumab treatment showed a significant decrease in VEGF levels (p=0.009), but this did not correlate with treatment response or hypertension development.
Why the study?
Does serial monitoring of serum VEGF, NO, and ANG II levels have a predictive role for treatment response and hypertension development during bevacizumab treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer?
Cohort (n=24)
Does serial monitoring of serum VEGF, NO, and ANG II levels have a predictive role for treatment response and hypertension development during bevacizumab treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer?
p-value: p=0.009
Dynamic monitoring of NO, ANG II, and VEGF does not appear useful as a predictive marker for treatment response or hypertension development during bevacizumab therapy in colorectal cancer.
Serial VEGF monitoring lacks predictive value for bevacizumab response or hypertension; leaves open utility of other angiogenic markers in metastatic colorectal cancer.
BACKGROUND: Standard treatment of colorectal cancer includes both cytostatic chemotherapy and targeted therapies. Bevacizumab, targeting the VEGF receptor, is one of the primary targeted therapies that achieve better response rate and survival rate as compared to combination chemotherapy. To the best of our knowledge, there is no established single marker that can be used as a predictive marker in bevacizumab therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We enrolled 24 patients with the diagnosis of metastatic colorectal cancer in our study. During the study, 2 blood samples were drawn from patients before the first cycle and after the sixth cycle of bevacizumab therapy. Serum levels of VEGF, ANG II, and NO were recorded. RESULTS: While the change across VEGF levels was found to be a statistically significant decreasing trend (p=0.009), this decrease was not found to be correlated with treatment response and hypertension development. Additionally, no statistically significant difference was found in terms of NO and ANG II levels. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed a significant decrease in serum VEGF, but failed to show a significant change in NO and ANG II levels during bevacizumab treatment. Although no significant correlation was found between the presence of hypertension and markers, most patients (83%) had an increase in their blood pressure. Our results suggest that dynamic monitoring of NO and ANG II, along with VEGF, may not be useful as predictive markers for bevacizumab treatment in colorectal cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2014 study conducted a cohort in Metastatic colorectal cancer (n=24). Bevacizumab treatment was evaluated on Change in serum levels of VEGF, ANG II, and NO and correlation with treatment response and hypertension (p=0.009). Serial monitoring during bevacizumab treatment showed a significant decrease in VEGF levels (p=0.009), but this did not correlate with treatment response or hypertension development.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: