Key result
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery during transvenous lead extraction was associated with a superior vena cava tear rate of 22.2% compared to 1.2% without VATS (P=0.03).
Why the study?
Does video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) improve the recognition and management of complications during transvenous lead extraction in high-risk patients?
Cohort (n=91)
Does video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) improve the recognition and management of complications during transvenous lead extraction in high-risk patients?
Utilization of VATS during transvenous lead extraction in high-risk patients facilitates early recognition and successful surgical repair of severe complications like SVC tears.
May support VATS-assisted TLE in select high-risk cases; leaves open need for prospective trials before wider adoption.
INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) during transvenous lead extractions (TLEs). METHODS AND RESULTS: Ninety-one high-risk patients who underwent TLE in the operating room from January 1, 2015, to March 31, 2017, were included in the study. Of these, 9 patients underwent VATS during TLE. Their clinical characteristics, indications for lead extraction, and complications associated with TLE in the 9 patients who had VATS were compared with those for the 82 patients who did not have VATS. The mean (SD) age of the study patients was 61 (17) years (64.8% were male). The lead dwell time, number of leads extracted, and clinical comorbidities were similar between the 2 groups. Superior vena cava (SVC) tear occurred in 2 of the 9 patients in VATS group and in 1 of the 82 in the non-VATS group (22.2% vs. 1.2%, P = 0.03). Of the 2 patients in the VATS group who had SVC tears, in 1 the tear was visualized immediately and there was no hemodynamic compromise. In the other patient, the SVC tear was within the pericardium; the blood pressure recovered quickly after sternotomy and repair. Both patients had complete lead extraction and survived hospitalization. The patient in the non-VATS group who had an SVC tear had a successful repair but died of postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Utilization of VATS to facilitate TLE is beneficial for early recognition of SVC tear and timely surgical repair in select high-risk patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dai et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Transvenous lead extraction (n=91). Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) vs. No VATS was evaluated on Superior vena cava (SVC) tear (p=0.03). Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery during transvenous lead extraction was associated with a superior vena cava tear rate of 22.2% compared to 1.2% without VATS (P=0.03).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: