Key result
Retroviruses from multiple sclerosis patient cell lines appeared type-C-like, with a significant relation between disease activity and reactivity towards retroviral peptides.
Retroviruses found in cell lines from MS patients show type-C-like characteristics and a significant relation between disease activity and reactivity to retroviral peptides.
Suggests retroviral link to MS activity; hypothesis-generating in animal models and leaves open human relevance.
These studies were performed to characterize retroviruses found in cell lines spontaneously developed from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNC) from 6 multiple sclerosis patients, a patient with progressive myelopathy and a healthy control. The cell lines are B-lymphoblastoid and produce Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) particles or express EBV proteins. The B-lymphoblastoid cell lines are also characterized by production of low, fluctuating amounts of retrovirus. The low productivity complicates purification and characterization, but implementation of product-enhanced reverse transcriptase (PERT) assays has provided a highly useful tool for monitoring retrovirus production. By electron microscopy, the retroviral particles appear type-C-like. Functional assays indicate the presence of Pol, Gag and Env. Indirect ELISA demonstrates a significant relation between disease activity and reactivity towards retroviral peptides. Molecular characterization is primarily based on RT-PCR, cloning, sequencing and Northern- or Southern analyses. Molecular characterization is continuing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Christensen et al. (1997) studied Multiple sclerosis (n=8). Retroviruses from PBMNC cell lines vs. Healthy control was evaluated on Retrovirus characterization and reactivity towards retroviral peptides. Retroviruses from multiple sclerosis patient cell lines appeared type-C-like, with a significant relation between disease activity and reactivity towards retroviral peptides.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: