Key result
Implantation of an additional single-coil subcutaneous array electrode significantly reduced the mean defibrillation threshold from 33.3 J to 25.3 J (p=0.0022) in ICD patients with high defibrillation thresholds.
Why the study?
Does the implantation of an additional subcutaneous array electrode reduce the defibrillation threshold in ICD patients with high baseline thresholds?
Observational (n=15)
No
Does the implantation of an additional subcutaneous array electrode reduce the defibrillation threshold in ICD patients with high baseline thresholds?
Mean Difference: -8
Absolute Event Rate: 25.3% vs 33.3%
p-value: p=0.0022
Implantation of an additional subcutaneous array electrode safely and effectively reduces the defibrillation threshold in ICD patients with insufficient safety margins.
May aid select high-threshold ICD cases; hypothesis-generating from Level 5 data and requires prospective trials before adoption.
INTRODUCTION: Among the recipients of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), there is a group of patients in whom the defibrillation threshold (DFT) is too high to enable a sufficient safety margin between the DFT and the maximal available output of the device. The aim of the study was to investigate the ability of an additionally implanted single-coil subcutaneous array electrode to reduce the DFT in such patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Medtronic 6996SQ electrode was implanted in 15 patients selected from our follow-up group of 741 ICD patients: 10 of them had insufficient post-implant DFT safety margin, and 5 had ineffective first maximal energy shock as recorded by the device. In 6 cases the patients had CRT-D devices, in 5 cases - dual-chamber ICDs, and in 4 cases - single-chamber ICDs. In all patients but one the defibrillating electrode was single-coil. In one patient it was dual-coil. The underlying disease was coronary artery disease in 10 patients, dilated cardiomyopathy in 4 patients and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in 1 patient. RESULTS: The subcutaneous electrode was successfully implanted in all the patients qualified for the procedure. No technical issues or perioperative complications were observed. Mean DFT was reduced from 33.3 ±4.1 J before the procedure to 25.3 ±4.4 J after the implantation procedure (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that the use of a single-coil subcutaneous electrode to reduce the DFT is a safe and effective procedure. Further studies are necessary to confirm these results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kempa et al. (2013) conducted an observational in High defibrillation threshold in ICD patients (n=15). Additional single-coil subcutaneous array electrode (Medtronic 6996SQ) vs. Baseline (pre-implantation) was evaluated on Defibrillation threshold (DFT) (reduction of 8.0 J, p=0.0022). Implantation of an additional single-coil subcutaneous array electrode significantly reduced the mean defibrillation threshold from 33.3 J to 25.3 J (p=0.0022) in ICD patients with high defibrillation thresholds.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: