Why the study?
What is the classification accuracy of various electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy compared to echocardiography in normal weight and overweight older adults?
Population
2,963 older adults aged 65 and older derived from the Cardiovascular Health Study population-based sample…
Comparison
Electrocardiographic criteria for left… vs Echocardiographically measured left ventricular…
Design
Cross-sectional
Key result
The sensitivity of ECG criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy was relatively low, peaking at 40.8% for Novacode LVMI in normal weight men, and deteriorated in the presence of obesity.
Authors
Loading...
Supports preferring echocardiography for LVH in obese older adults; extends ECG limitation data and leaves open optimal screening strategies.
Cross-Sectional (n=2,963)
What is the classification accuracy of various electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy compared to echocardiography in normal weight and overweight older adults?
Standard ECG criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy have low sensitivity that further deteriorates in obese patients, highlighting the limitations of relying solely on ECG for LVH screening in overweight older adults.
Rautaharju et al. (1996) conducted a cross-sectional in Left ventricular hypertrophy (n=2,963). Electrocardiographic (ECG) criteria for LVH vs. Echocardiographically measured left ventricular mass was evaluated on Sensitivity of ECG criteria for LVH at 95% specificity. The sensitivity of ECG criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy was relatively low, peaking at 40.8% for Novacode LVMI in normal weight men, and deteriorated in the presence of obesity.