Key result
The sensitivity of ECG criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy was relatively low, peaking at 40.8% for Novacode LVMI in normal weight men, and deteriorated in the presence of obesity.
Why the study?
What is the classification accuracy of various electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy compared to echocardiography in normal weight and overweight older adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=2,963)
What is the classification accuracy of various electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy compared to echocardiography in normal weight and overweight older adults?
Standard ECG criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy have low sensitivity that further deteriorates in obese patients, highlighting the limitations of relying solely on ECG for LVH screening in overweight older adults.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports preferring echocardiography for LVH in obese older adults; extends ECG limitation data and leaves open optimal screening strategies.
Background: We evaluated classification accuracy of ECG criteria at varying levels of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) severity according to echocardiographically measured left ventricular mass (LVM) adjusted to body size. Methods: The test population was derived from the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS), a population‐based sample of 5201 men and women aged 65 and older, and consisted of 1844 women and 1119 men with adequate quality ECGs and echocardiograms for LVM determination. The criteria evaluated were Sokolow‐Lyon, Cornell voltage, Cornell product, Framingham modification of the Cornell voltage, and the left ventricular mass index (LVMI) of the Novacode ECG program. Results: With LVH thresholds at upper 95% normal limit for weight adjusted LVM for the CHS population and ECG thresholds adjusted for 95% specificity in normal weight and overweight subgroups, the sensitivity of ECG criteria for LVH was relatively low. It was highest (40.8%) for the Novacode LVMI in normal weight men and for the Framingham criteria (30.9%) in normal weight women, but it deteriorated for both of these criteria in the presence of obesity. The overall performance of the Cornell product and Cornell voltage criteria was least influenced by obesity. The Framingham adjustment for the Cornell voltage criteria for obesity substantially reduced their sensitivity. Conclusion: The choice of echocardiographic standard, LVH severity level and overweight in the test groups have a strong influence on ECG evaluation results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rautaharju et al. (1996) conducted a cross-sectional in Left ventricular hypertrophy (n=2,963). Electrocardiographic (ECG) criteria for LVH vs. Echocardiographically measured left ventricular mass was evaluated on Sensitivity of ECG criteria for LVH at 95% specificity. The sensitivity of ECG criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy was relatively low, peaking at 40.8% for Novacode LVMI in normal weight men, and deteriorated in the presence of obesity.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: