Why the study?
What is the diagnostic accuracy of ECG criteria (Sokolow-Lyon and Cornell) for detecting left ventricular hypertrophy compared to echocardiography in a Korean general population?
Population
1,946 adults from a community-based cohort in Korea
Comparison
Electrocardiogram criteria for left ventricular… vs Echocardiographic measurement of left…
Design
Cohort
Key result
Electrocardiogram criteria for detecting left ventricular hypertrophy in a Korean general population showed low sensitivity (2.8-14.3%) and high specificity (93.6-98.7%), with suboptimal AUCs (0.52-0.60), limiting their usefulness as a mass screening tool.
Authors
Loading...
ECG criteria lack screening utility in Korean adults; leaves open whether ethnicity-specific thresholds improve detection.
Cross-Sectional (n=1,956)
No
What is the diagnostic accuracy of ECG criteria (Sokolow-Lyon and Cornell) for detecting left ventricular hypertrophy compared to echocardiography in a Korean general population?
ECG criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy have low sensitivity and suboptimal performance in the general Korean population, limiting their usefulness as a mass screening tool.
Ahn et al. (2013) conducted a cross-sectional in Left ventricular hypertrophy (n=1,956). Electrocardiogram criteria (Sokolow-Lyon and Cornell) vs. Echocardiography (Left ventricular mass index) was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve) of ECG criteria for detecting left ventricular hypertrophy. Electrocardiogram criteria for detecting left ventricular hypertrophy in a Korean general population showed low sensitivity (2.8-14.3%) and high specificity (93.6-98.7%), with suboptimal AUCs (0.52-0.60), limiting their usefulness as a mass screening tool.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: