Key result
Peri-dialysis blood pressure measurements overestimated true BP burden, with post-dialysis SBP showing a significant independent association with ABPM systolic BP (β 0.716; p<0.001).
Why the study?
Do peri-dialysis blood pressure measurements accurately reflect the true blood pressure burden assessed by ABPM in ESRD patients on hemodialysis?
Observational (n=43)
No
Do peri-dialysis blood pressure measurements accurately reflect the true blood pressure burden assessed by ABPM in ESRD patients on hemodialysis?
Effect estimate: β 0.716
p-value: p=<0.001
Peri-dialysis blood pressure measurements overestimate true blood pressure burden in ESRD patients, suggesting post-dialysis SBP and both pre- and post-dialysis DBP are better indicators of true BP control when ABPM is unavailable.
Peri-dialysis BP warrants cautious interpretation in hemodialysis; hypothesis-generating for post-dialysis SBP as ABPM surrogate pending validation.
AIMS: End-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients on dialysis are perceived to have difficult-to-control blood pressure (BP) and commonly treated with complex antihypertensive regimens. Our hypothesis was that peri-dialysis BP will overestimate the true burden of hypertension in these patients. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We performed 44-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in 43 patients recruited from the University of Mississippi outpatient dialysis unit. Data collected included routine peri-dialysis blood systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), weight gain, and demographic information. We investigated whether the pre-dialysis or post-dialysis blood pressure would better correspond to the ABPM results. RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 50.5 ± 12.05 years, 95% African-American, and 44% diabetic with an average dialysis vintage of 31.1 ± 30 months. The mean SBP and DBP were 164.6/87.9 mmHg ± 22.3/15 before dialysis, 151.5/81.3 mmHg ± 24.1/13 after dialysis and 136/80.6 mmHg ± 23.5/14.7 during ABPM. There were wide limits of agreements between peri-dialysis BP and ABPM, the largest with pre-dialysis SBP (28.5 ± 16.6 mmHg) and the least with post-dialysis DBP (0.7 ± 10 mmHg). With both peri-dialysis BP measurements as explanatory variables in a linear regression model, only the post-dialysis SBP (β 0.716; p < 0.001) but not pre-dialysis SBP (β 0.157; p = 0.276) had a significant independent association with ABPM systolic BP. For DBP, both pre-dialysis (β 0.543; p = 0.001) and post-dialysis (β 0.317; p = 0.037) values retained correlation with DBP on ABPM. CONCLUSION: Peri-dialysis measurements overestimated true BP burden in this Southeastern U.S. cohort of ESRD patients. When BP readings from outside the dialysis unit are notavailable, assessment of BP control should focus pre-dialysis on DBP and post-dialysison both SBP and DBP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fülöp et al. (2011) conducted an observational in End-stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis (n=43). Peri-dialysis blood pressure measurement vs. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) was evaluated on Independent association of post-dialysis SBP with ABPM systolic BP (β 0.716, p=<0.001). Peri-dialysis blood pressure measurements overestimated true BP burden, with post-dialysis SBP showing a significant independent association with ABPM systolic BP (β 0.716; p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: