Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The activity of protein kinase C is reversibly regulated by an autoinhibitory pseudosubstrate, which blocks the active site of the enzyme in the absence of activators. However, before it can be allosterically regulated, protein kinase C must first be processed by three ordered phosphorylations, the first of which is modification of the activation loop catalyzed by the phosphoinositide-dependent kinase-1 (PDK-1). Here we use limited proteolysis to show that 1) newly synthesized protein kinase C adopts a conformation in which its pseudosubstrate sequence is removed from the active site, and 2) this exposure is essential to allow PDK-1 to phosphorylate the enzyme. Precursor (unphosphorylated) protein kinase C betaII obtained by 1) in vitro transcription and translation, 2) expression of a phosphorylation-deficient mutant (T500V), or 3) in vivo labeling with a pulse of [(35)S]cysteine/methionine is cleaved at the amino-terminal pseudosubstrate by the endoproteinase Arg-C. In marked contrast to mature (phosphorylated) enzyme, proteolysis occurs in the absence of lipid activators, revealing that precursor protein kinase C has its pseudosubstrate sequence removed constitutively. Additionally, we show that PDK-1 is unable to phosphorylate protein kinase C when the active site is sterically blocked by a peptide substrate. Neither can mature enzyme be dephosphorylated when the active site is blocked by binding either the pseudosubstrate sequence or a heterologous substrate. Thus, the accessibility of the activation loop to both phosphorylation and dephosphorylation requires an exposed pseudosubstrate. In summary, newly synthesized protein kinase C adopts a conformation in which its pseudosubstrate sequence is removed from the active site, rendering the activation loop accessible to phosphorylation by PDK-1. Phosphorylation serves as a conformational switch to position the pseudosubstrate so that it blocks the active site, a conformation that is maintained until stimulus-dependent membrane binding releases it, thus activating the enzyme.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dutil et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: