Key result
Cardiac catheterization techniques are well standardized for congenital and acquired valvular lesions, but methods for studying myocardial function and ischaemic heart disease remain limited.
This review highlights the established role of cardiac catheterization in evaluating congenital and valvular heart disease, while noting its limitations in assessing myocardial function and ischaemic heart disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Catheterization's established valvular role warrants selective use; leaves open standardization of myocardial and ischemic protocols.
Summary The haemodynamic parameters used in detecting and assessing each of several common cardio‐vascular abnormalities are presented, and the pertinent catheterization techniques are described. Methods for studying patients with the more common congenital cardiac malformations are for the most part well standardized, and when adequate data are obtained, these are usually easily interpreted. Acquired valvular lesions, especially stenotic ones, can also be evaluated by standard techniques and the severity of such lesions accurately determined. In contrast, methods for studying myocardial function are less satisfactory. The parameters usually employed in assessing myocardial performance are also influenced by extra‐myocardial factors, and some of the more meaningful methods of studying myocardial contractility are still too complex and time‐consuming for routine use. Except for selective angiocardiography, cardiac catheterization techniques are likewise of only limited help in evaluating patients with ischaemic heart disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Glancy et al. (1970) conducted a review in Cardiovascular abnormalities. Cardiac catheterization was evaluated. Cardiac catheterization techniques are well standardized for congenital and acquired valvular lesions, but methods for studying myocardial function and ischaemic heart disease remain limited.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: