Key result
A brisk standing maneuver produced a maximum change in QTcF with a lower 90% confidence interval bound >5 milliseconds, meeting the ICH E14 regulatory requirement for a positive control.
Why the study?
Does a standing maneuver reliably induce QTcF prolongation as a positive control in healthy male subjects?
RCT (n=40)
Double-blind
Randomized
No
Does a standing maneuver reliably induce QTcF prolongation as a positive control in healthy male subjects?
A brisk standing maneuver reliably induces significant QTcF prolongation, validating its use as a positive control for QT assessment in early drug development studies.
Standing maneuver meets QTc positive-control criteria; confirms ICH E14 compliance and extends non-pharmacologic options for early development studies.
BACKGROUND: Standing invoked change in QT interval has been identified as a promising autonomic maneuver for the assessment of QT/QTc prolongation in patients with underlying heart abnormalities or as a positive control in healthy volunteers for drug studies. Criticism for its more widespread use is the high variability in reported results and the need for a more standardized methodology with defined normal ranges. METHODS: Forty healthy male subjects underwent continuous ECG collection on the day before dosing in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, single ascending dose trial. A brisk supine to standing (3 minutes) response was conducted at three time points. Results were grouped by treatment cohort or assessed as a pooled group at each time point. Maximum time and median change from baseline (ΔTmax QTcF, ΔQTcF) were calculated for each individual over sequential 30-second periods staggered by 5 seconds. RESULTS: Maximum ΔQTcF at all time points and in all groups was significant (i.e., the lower bound of 90% CI was > 5 milliseconds) which is the ICH E14 regulatory requirement for a positive control. Variability of the time to maximum response was also reduced 9-fold by the third time period. CONCLUSIONS: Standing invoked ΔQTcF can be utilized to validate the sensitivity of a study for assessment of the QT interval effect of drugs in early development. The methodology may be used to further improve its diagnostic use of long QT syndromes by reducing the variability and allowing adequate definition of normal limits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fossa et al. (2013) conducted an RCT in Healthy volunteers (n=40). Brisk standing maneuver vs. Supine baseline was evaluated on Maximum change from baseline in QTcF (ΔQTcF). A brisk standing maneuver produced a maximum change in QTcF with a lower 90% confidence interval bound >5 milliseconds, meeting the ICH E14 regulatory requirement for a positive control.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: