Key result
Implantation of two MitraClips compared to one resulted in similar rates of no or mild residual mitral regurgitation at discharge but higher 1-year cerebral-vascular events.
Why the study?
It is often assumed that outcomes are intrinsically better after implanting more than one MitraClip, but data comparing one versus two clips remain sparse.
Does implantation of two MitraClips improve clinical outcomes compared to one MitraClip in patients undergoing transcatheter mitral valve intervention?
Observational (n=803)
Yes
Does implantation of two MitraClips improve clinical outcomes compared to one MitraClip in patients undergoing transcatheter mitral valve intervention?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In a real-world registry, using two MitraClips instead of one did not improve 1-year mortality, NYHA status, or residual MR, but was associated with a higher risk of cerebrovascular events.
OBJECTIVES: To compare baseline characteristics and outcomes in patients treated with either 1 or 2 MitraClips in the German TRAMI (Transcatheter Mitral Valve Interventions) registry. BACKGROUND: The MitraClip community seems to silently assume that results should intrinsically be better after implantation of more than one clip, although data is still sparse. METHODS: In 2010-2013, 803 patients were enrolled prospectively into TRAMI (461 one-clip and 312 two-clip procedures). Follow-up was performed centrally at 30 days and 1 year. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of TRAMI-patients with two clips differed significantly from single-clip patients regarding constitutional (more men, taller body height) and heart failure-related factors (larger left ventricular dimensions, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, more severe heart failure). Also, a significant increase in two-clip procedures over time was present. After propensity score matching for differing baseline characteristics, residual moderate mitral regurgitation (MR) occurred more frequently after implantation of two clips, whereas residual severe MR could more frequently be observed after one-clip procedures. However, no or mild residual MR at discharge was present in 71.6% after single-clip and in 70.1% after two-clips implantation (p = .81). After 1 year, no significant differences regarding mortality or New York Heart Association status could be detected in the propensity matched cohorts. However, TRAMI-patients treated with two clips had a significantly higher incidence of cerebral-vascular events (p = .02). CONCLUSIONS: TRAMI data cannot support the theory that implantation of more than one clip is associated with better clinical outcomes. The finding of more cerebral-vascular events after two-clip procedures might be hypothesis-generating.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Puls et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Mitral regurgitation (n=803). Two MitraClips vs. One MitraClip was evaluated on No or mild residual mitral regurgitation at discharge (p=.81). Implantation of two MitraClips compared to one resulted in similar rates of no or mild residual mitral regurgitation at discharge but higher 1-year cerebral-vascular events.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: