Key result
The use of the double-orifice mitral valve technique during mitral valve reoperation in children was an independent risk factor for requiring a second reoperation (HR 8.136).
Why the study?
The study aimed to investigate the outcomes of mitral valve reoperations in children with congenital mitral valve diseases and summarize treatment experience.
Cohort (n=24)
No
Hazard Ratio: 8.136 (95% CI 1.099–60.24)
p-value: p=0.040
In children undergoing reoperation for congenital mitral valve disease, the use of the double-orifice mitral valve technique is associated with a significantly higher risk of requiring a subsequent reoperation or mechanical valve replacement.
Caution advised using double-orifice technique in pediatric mitral reoperations; leaves optimal repair strategy open for prospective trials.
BACKGROUNDS: We aimed to study the outcomes of mitral valve (MV) reoperations in children with congenital MV diseases and to summarize our treatment experience. METHODS: In this single-center retrospective study, we enrolled 24 patients aged < 18 years who underwent MV reoperation from among 265 patients who underwent MV repair between January 2013 and July 2023. MV reoperations were based on the types of MV disease. Cox regressions were used to analyze the risk factors for death and second MV reoperation. RESULTS: A total of 5 patients underwent second MV reoperations. 3 patients experienced early death, and 1 experienced late death. The 3- and 5-year survival rates of the entire cohort were 86.6% ± 7.3% and 72.1% ± 14.5%, respectively. Patients who had the double-orifice MV technique applied during MV reoperation were significantly more prone to receive mechanical MV replacement (P < 0.0001). The use of double-orifice MV technique during MV reoperation was identified as an independent risk factor for second MV reoperation (HR = 8.136, 95%CI = 1.099-60.240; P = 0.040). CONCLUSIONS: The reoperation of the MV in children with congenital MV diseases poses a formidable challenge, manifested by a high postoperative mortality rate and re-intervention rate. Patiently and meticulously repair based on the types of MV disease has demonstrated the capacity to enhance and sustain stable valve function and cardiac function in the vast majority of children. The use of the double-orifice MV technique did not achieve ideal therapeutic results in children with complex valve lesions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cai et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Congenital mitral valve diseases (n=24). Double-orifice mitral valve technique vs. Other mitral valve repair techniques was evaluated on Second mitral valve reoperation (HR 8.136, 95% CI 1.099-60.240, p=0.040). The use of the double-orifice mitral valve technique during mitral valve reoperation in children was an independent risk factor for requiring a second reoperation (HR 8.136).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: