Key result
Chronic extraction of EV ICD leads from the substernal space was successfully performed using traction and simple tools through 3 years in sheep.
Why the study?
The extravascular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (EV ICD) with substernal lead implantation is a potential alternative to transvenous and subcutaneous systems, but chronic extraction data were lacking.
Are extravascular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (EV ICD) leads safely extractable compared to transvenous leads in a sheep model?
Are extravascular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (EV ICD) leads safely extractable compared to transvenous leads in a sheep model?
Chronic extraction of substernal EV ICD leads is feasible and generally safe up to 3 years in a sheep model, requiring simple traction or extraction tools.
Supports EV ICD extraction feasibility in sheep; leaves open human safety and comparative data.
BACKGROUND: The extravascular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (EV ICD) with lead implantation in the substernal space may provide an alternative to transvenous and subcutaneous systems. This is the first-reported chronic extraction experience for EV ICD leads. The aim of the study is to evaluate the chronic encapsulation and extractability of EV ICD leads. METHODS: Two EV ICD leads and one transvenous lead were implanted in each of 24 mature sheep. A subset of animals was evaluated yearly for histology and lead extractability. Extractions were performed using simple traction or extraction tools. Histology evaluated the encapsulating tissue. RESULTS: At 1 year, extraction was performed successfully for two of five EV ICD leads with traction alone using ≤3.1 kg-force (kgf) and the remainder extracted successfully with extraction tools; no transvenous leads were removed with traction alone. At 2 years, no EV ICD or transvenous leads were extracted with traction alone, while at 3 years, one of eight EV ICD leads and two of four transvenous leads were extracted with traction (0.8 and ≤2.3 kgf, respectively). There was one observation of hemopericardium resulting in tamponade with EV ICD extraction but without injury to cardiovascular structures and related to the unique implant tract. Among transvenous leads, inversion of the ventricle with loss of cardiac output resulted in abandonment of traction for two animals. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic extraction of EV ICD leads from the substernal space was successfully performed using traction and simple tools through 3 years in sheep with one observation of hemopericardium that did not originate from cardiovascular injury.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2022 study studied EV ICD lead extraction (n=24). Extravascular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (EV ICD) lead extraction vs. Transvenous lead extraction was evaluated on Chronic encapsulation and extractability of leads. Chronic extraction of EV ICD leads from the substernal space was successfully performed using traction and simple tools through 3 years in sheep.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: