‘In Situ’ Characterization of Gnrh Receptors: Use of Two Radioimagers and Comparison with Quantitative Autoradiography

This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.

New radioimagers, the HRRI (high resolution radioimager) and the Phosphorimager (phosphor screen : PS), apt to display more ample linear dose-response scale than radio-sensitive films, were tested in comparison with quantitative autoradiography (QA). GnRH receptor saturation experiments were achieved on tissue sections (rat pituitary, rat brain, human ovary) with a iodinate GnRH agonist (125I-[D-Ala6,Des-Gly10]-LH-RH Ethylamide) for determination of affinity constant (Kd). In rat pituitary, comparable results were obtained with the 3 methods (Kd: 0.4 to 0.6 nM). Discrepancies occurred in the hippocampus and in the granulosa cell layer of the preovulatory follicle, due to low resolutive (PS) or short linear dose-response (films) performances. In the hippocampus GnRH receptor affinity was under-estimated with PS (Kd: 2.3 vs 0.5 and 0.6 nM for QA and HRRI respectively). In the follicular granulosa cell layer it was over-estimated by QA (0.5 vs 50 nM for the HRRI), while PS did not allow resolution of this thin cell layer. In conclusion, the HRRI is a very powerful tool for the quantification of in situ radioligand binding (binding sites study and in situ hybridization) in very discrete areas.