Key result
The Autocapture function was projected to increase pacemaker longevity by 53% to 245% and reduce pacing-related costs by 25% to 57% over 15 years compared to standard settings.
Why the study?
Does automatic threshold tracking improve projected pacemaker longevity and reduce pacing related costs in patients with VVIR pacemakers?
Population
25 patients who had received a VVIR pacemaker (Microny SR+ 2425T) with Autocapture function
Comparison
Automatic adaptation of device output coupled… vs Standard Output and Low Output settings of the…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
15-year (projected)
Authors
Loading...
Projected longevity and cost benefits with Autocapture should not yet alter VVIR practice; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
Observational (n=25)
Does automatic threshold tracking improve projected pacemaker longevity and reduce pacing related costs in patients with VVIR pacemakers?
Effect estimate: 53% to 245% increase in longevity; 25% to 57% reduction in costs
Automatic threshold tracking in pacemakers significantly increases projected battery longevity and reduces pacing-related costs compared to standard fixed-output settings.
Boriani et al. (2000) conducted an observational in Patients requiring a VVIR pacemaker (n=25). Autocapture function (automatic adaptation of stimulation output) vs. Standard Output (5 V) settings / standard device was evaluated on Projected pacemaker longevity and pacing related costs (53% to 245% increase in longevity; 25% to 57% reduction in costs). The Autocapture function was projected to increase pacemaker longevity by 53% to 245% and reduce pacing-related costs by 25% to 57% over 15 years compared to standard settings.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: