near-field plane-wave pulses can he used to produce a complementary uncertainty also can introduce in measurement of response pattern; i.e., response vs. frequency at a constant angle, as opposed to response vs. angle at a constant frequency. Directional am- the phase response, particularly in the megahertz freplitude and phase responses in the 1-10 MHz range have been obtained quency range [31, [51. Another possible inaccuracy is reusing this method for miniature ultrasonic hydrophones (sl mm di- lated to the effect of the temperature variations on the ameter). The pulsed waveforms measured by the hydrophone were dig- measurement of the directional phase response. More will itized and Fourier-transformed. Normalization with respect to the hydrophone’s on-axis response was accomplished by a simple spectral subtraction procedure. The angular and frequency resolutions of the technique are typically 0.25” and 100 kHz, respectively. From these data of measuring the plane-wave directivity pattern has been be said on these potential phase errors later. To eliminate these potential errors, an alternate method an effective hydrophone radius as a function of frequency can be computed more quickly and efficiently than would be possible using present practices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harris et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: