Key result
This review highlights the lack of standardization in aPTT and PT mixing studies and describes common indications, preanalytic variables, and interpretation methods for these tests.
Why the study?
There is a lack of standardization for both the testing protocol and the interpretation of corrected versus noncorrected aPTT and PT mixing studies.
Design
Review
Authors
Loading...
Inconsistent mixing study protocols may lead to variable clinical interpretations; leaves open the need for evidence-based standardization.
This review highlights the lack of standardization in aPTT and PT mixing studies and discusses indications, preanalytic variables, and interpretation methods.
Adcock et al. (2022) conducted a review in Prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) or prothrombin time (PT). aPTT and PT mixing studies was evaluated. This review highlights the lack of standardization in aPTT and PT mixing studies and describes common indications, preanalytic variables, and interpretation methods for these tests.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: