Key result
High-intensity interval training significantly improved peak oxygen uptake by 1.678 mL/kg/min compared to moderate-intensity continuous training in patients with coronary heart disease post-surgery.
Why the study?
High-intensity interval training has emerged as a cardiac rehabilitation strategy after surgery for coronary heart disease, but its efficacy compared to moderate-intensity continuous training remains uncertain.
Does high-intensity interval training improve cardiopulmonary function and quality of life in adult patients with coronary heart disease post-PCI or CABG compared to moderate-intensity continuous training?
Meta-Analysis (n=2,929)
Does high-intensity interval training improve cardiopulmonary function and quality of life in adult patients with coronary heart disease post-PCI or CABG compared to moderate-intensity continuous training?
Mean Difference: 1.678 (95% CI 1.082–2.275)
p-value: p=<0.001
High-intensity interval training is a time-efficient and effective alternative to moderate-intensity continuous training for improving cardiopulmonary function and quality of life in patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation after PCI or CABG.
Favors HIIT over MICT in post-revascularization cardiac rehab; strengthens Level 1 evidence for guideline adoption.
BACKGROUND: High-intensity interval training (HIIT) has emerged as a potential cardiac rehabilitation strategy for coronary heart disease (CHD) post-surgery, but its efficacy compared to moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) remains uncertain. AIM: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of HIIT on cardiopulmonary function and quality of life in CHD patients post-PCI or CABG in comparison with MICT. METHODS: We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials from PMID, Cochrane, Embase, Wanfang, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases comparing HIIT with MICT in CHD patients. Data on peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak), left ventricular ejection function (LVEF), heart rates, and quality of life were extracted and analyzed using random-or fixed-effects models based on heterogeneity. RESULTS: peak by 1.678 mL/kg/min (95%CI = 1.082-2.275), increased LVEF by 2.831% (95%CI = 1.124-4.538), enhanced peak HR by 6.717 beats/min (95%CI = 5.111-8.323) compared to MICT. Resting HR did not differ significantly between groups. Quality of life (SMD = 0.132, 95%CI = 0.051-0.213, P = 0.001) was significantly elevated by HIIT, particularly in the physical domain. Subgroup analyses showed consistent benefits of HIIT across exercise durations and times. CONCLUSION: HIIT effectively enhances cardiopulmonary function and quality of life in CHD post-surgery. HIIT may be a time-efficient alternative to MICT in cardiac rehabilitation programs. However, publication bias and high heterogeneity warrant caution in interpreting these results, indicating a need for further research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu Fei (2025) conducted a meta-analysis in Coronary heart disease post-PCI or CABG (n=2,929). High-intensity interval training vs. Moderate-intensity continuous training was evaluated on Peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) (WMD 1.678, 95% CI 1.082-2.275, p=<0.001). High-intensity interval training significantly improved peak oxygen uptake by 1.678 mL/kg/min compared to moderate-intensity continuous training in patients with coronary heart disease post-surgery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: