Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The in vitro activity of 6-[d-alpha-(3 guanylureido)-phenylacetamido]-penicillanic acid (BL-P1654) was evaluated against 117 clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, many of which were known to be resistant to both gentamicin and carbenicillin. BL-P1654 was two to eight times more active than carbenicillin against P. aeruginosa. However, all 28 highly carbenicillin-resistant isolates (minimal inhibitory concentration [MIC] > 500 mug/ml) were also highly resistant to BL-P1654. When an MIC of 32 mug/ml or less and a zone of inhibition of 12 mm or more by a 10-mug disk were used as criteria indicating susceptibility to BL-P1654, the false-resistance rate by the disk test was 10.6% and the false-susceptibility rate was 4.2%. The combination of BL-P1654 and gentamicin was synergistic against 45 of 70 isolates of P. aeruginosa tested, but synergism was demonstrated against only 4 of 24 highly gentamicin-resistant (MIC > 63 mug/ml), 1 of 12 highly BL-P1654-resistant (MIC > 250 mug/ml) isolates, and none of nine isolates highly resistant to both of these antibiotics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Watanakunakorn et al. (1974) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: