This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The default explanation for good to high diastereomeric excess when reducing N-chiral imines possessing only mediocre cis/trans-imine ratios (>15% cis-imine) has invariably been in situ cis-to-trans isomerization before reduction; but until now no study unequivocally supported this conclusion. The present study co-examines an alternative hypothesis, namely that some classes of cis-imines may hold conformations that erode the inherent facial bias of the chiral auxiliary, providing more of the trans-imine reduction product than would otherwise be expected. The ensuing experimental and computational (DFT) results favor the former, pre-existing, explanation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nugent et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: