Key result
This review analyzes clinical results from 6 observational and randomized studies to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents.
Why the study?
Do drug-eluting stents with biodegradable polymers offer clinical advantages over traditional stents in patients undergoing coronary angioplasty?
Do drug-eluting stents with biodegradable polymers offer clinical advantages over traditional stents in patients undergoing coronary angioplasty?
This review summarizes the clinical results, advantages, and disadvantages of biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents based on 6 observational and randomized studies.
May inform stent selection in angioplasty; leaves open net clinical benefit of biodegradable polymers versus durable alternatives.
Coronary angioplasty with drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation is currently the most common stent procedure worldwide. Since the introduction of DES, coronary restenosis as well as the incidence of target vessel and target lesion revascularization have been significantly reduced. However, the incidence of very late stent thrombosis beyond the first year after stent deployment has more commonly been linked to DES than to bare-metal stent (BMS) implantation. Several factors have been associated with very late stent thrombosis after DES implantation, such as delayed healing, inflammation, stent mal-apposition and endothelial dysfunction. Some of these adverse events were associated with the presence of durable polymers, which were essential to allow the elution of the immunosuppressive drug in the first DES designs. The introduction of erodable polymers in DES technology has provided the potential to complete the degradation of the polymer simultaneously or immediately after the release of the immunosuppressive drug, after which a BMS remains in place. Several DES designs with biodegradable (BIO) polymers have been introduced in preclinical and clinical studies, including randomized trials. In this review, we analyze the clinical results from 6 observational and randomized studies with BIO polymers and discuss advantages and disadvantages of this new technology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2011 study conducted a review in Coronary artery disease requiring angioplasty. Biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents was evaluated. This review analyzes clinical results from 6 observational and randomized studies to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: