Key result
An elevated Ang-2/BNP ratio > 2.7 after percutaneous LVAD implantation was significantly associated with future hemocompatibility-related adverse events (adjusted HR 25.6; 95% CI 2.58-255).
Why the study?
Angiopoietin-2 is inappropriately elevated relative to BNP in some LVAD patients, but its prognostic impact on hemocompatibility-related adverse events remained uninvestigated.
Does an elevated Ang-2/BNP ratio predict hemocompatibility-related adverse events in patients receiving percutaneous LVAD support?
Cohort (n=21)
Does an elevated Ang-2/BNP ratio predict hemocompatibility-related adverse events in patients receiving percutaneous LVAD support?
Hazard Ratio: 25.6 (95% CI 2.58–255)
Absolute Event Rate: 100% vs 34%
p-value: p=0.005
An elevated Ang-2/BNP ratio measured immediately after percutaneous LVAD implantation is a strong predictor of future hemocompatibility-related adverse events.
Despite considerable improvement in survival in heart failure patients receiving left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), hemocompatibility-related adverse events (HRAEs) including bleeding and thromboembolic evens remain as unsolved issues.1, 2 Inappropriate activation of the inflammatory and angiogenesis cascade including angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) seems to have a considerable association with the development of arteriovenous malformation and gastrointestinal bleeding during LVAD supports.3 Ang-2 is considerably associated with the plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels in the heart failure cohort. Furthermore, Ang-2 is inappropriately elevated relative to BNP levels in some LVAD patients.4 However, its prognostic impact on HRAEs remains uninvestigated. In this study, we investigated the prognostic impact of Ang-2 level relative to BNP (Ang-2/BNP) obtained immediately after percutaneous LVAD implantation on future occurrences of HRAE. In this prospective study, consecutive patients who received percutaneous LVAD between August 2018 and February 2019 were included. Indication of percutaneous LVAD therapy is determined by the attending cardiologists. In brief, candidates had cardiogenic shock refractory to guideline-directed medical therapy. All participants gave informed consents, and the institutional ethical review board approved this study beforehand. We affirm that this manuscript is an honest, accurate, and transparent account of the study being reported, that no important aspects of the study have been omitted, and that any discrepancies from the study as planned. The original data are available when required and considered to be appropriate. In addition to the baseline characteristics data, Ang-2/BNP was measured from patients' plasma within 3 days following LVAD implantation, using Human Angiopoietin-2 Quantikine ELISA Kit. A primary endpoint was set as any occurrence of HRAEs during LVAD supports. HRAEs consist of gastrointestinal bleeding, symptomatic stroke with image findings, and device thrombosis medically or surgically managed, according to the INTERMACS definition.2 Death, device explantation, or 30-day follow-up was censored. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics 22 (SPSS Inc, Armonk, Illinois). Continuous variables were expressed as median and interquartile. The impact of Ang-2/BNP on HRAE was investigated as a primary concern. Receiver operating characteristics analysis was performed to calculate a cutoff of Ang-2/BNP for the occurrence of HRAE. Kaplan–Meier analyses and log-rank tests were performed to compare freedom from HRAE between high Ang-2/BNP and low Ang-2/BNP groups. Cox proportional hazard ratio regression analyses were performed to investigate the impact of high Ang-2/BNP on the occurrence of HRAE by adjusting for age, which is another well-known risk factor of HRAE. In total, 21 patients (median 71 years old, 14 males) were included (Table 1). Ang-2 (median 5.0 pg/mL) and BNP (median 437 pg/mL) were measured within 3 days following LVAD implantation. Median Ang-2/BNP was 1.7 (0.9, 2.5). During 6-day (2, 15) LVAD support on median, there were seven HRAEs: four gastrointestinal bleedings, one ischemic stroke, two hemorrhagic strokes, and no device thrombosis. A cutoff of Ang-2/BNP to predict future HRAE was calculated as 2.7 with sensitivity of 0.57 and specificity of 1.00. Four patients had Ang-2/BNP > 2.7: two patients had cerebral bleedings and the other two had gastrointestinal bleedings. Freedom from HRAE was significantly stratified by the Ang-2/BNP of 2.7 (66% vs 0%, P = .005; Figure 1). Ang-2/BNP was a significant risk factor of future HRAE with an unadjusted hazard ratio of 7.53 (95% confidence interval 1.37-41.3) and an adjusted hazard ratio of 25.6 (95% confidence interval 2.58-255). For individual HRAEs, Ang-2/BNP cutoff of 2.7 had sensitivity of 0.50 and specificity of 0.88 to predict gastrointestinal bleedings and sensitivity of 0.67 and specificity of 0.89 to predict strokes. The inflammatory system has a considerable association with advanced heart failure: Ang-2 and BNP have a strong correlation in the heart failure cohort.5 Our team recently demonstrated that Ang-2 was inappropriately elevated relative to the BNP level during LVAD supports compared to the heart failure cohort,4 probably due to the stimulation of Ang-2 activity via hematological instability.6 This is a rationale of why we used Ang-2/BNP as a variable instead of Ang-2 alone. The detailed mechanism of the variety of Ang-2/BNP levels among each individual remains unknown. The association between Ang-2 and gastrointestinal bleeding during LVAD supports is receiving great concern. Inflammatory and angiogenesis cascade including Ang-2 might stimulate a formation of arteriovenous malformation and increase the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding.3 In this study, we demonstrated that the inappropriately elevated Ang-2 level predicted future bleedings. In other words, Ang-2 is inappropriately activated immediately following LVAD implantation in such high-risk patients. Elevated Ang-2/BNP level was associated with also the occurrence of stroke with high specificity. The detailed mechanism requires further investigations, but our team previously hypothesized the association among right ventricular failure, chronic inflammation, and stroke during LVAD supports.7 As a major marker of inflammation, Ang-2 might have a critical role in the occurrence of stroke. We should state that the study is a proof of concept, and the finding should be validated in larger scale studies. We adjusted for age alone, given its considerable impact on HRAE and small sample size,2 and we cannot deny any other confounders. We showed an association between Ang-2/BNP and HRAEs, but the causality remains unknown with a lack of detailed data explaining it. We observed just for 30 days, given that the devices were percutaneous ones, and the applicability of our findings to other durable LVADs remains uncertain. Nevertheless, our findings would give us a clue to risk-stratify patients for the future occurrence of HRAE during LVAD supports. Furthermore, any therapeutic intervention to improve the elevated Ang-2, including omega-3 fatty acid or any other more specific agents,8 might reduce the risk of HRAE. Elevated Ang-2 level soon after percutaneous LVAD implantation was associated with future HRAEs. The clinical implication to intervene in Ang-2 would be a future concern. Teruhiko Imamura receives grant support from JSPS KAKENHI: JP20K17143, which had no involvements in conducting the study and preparing the draft. Conceptualization: Teruhiko Imamura Formal analysis: Teruhiko Imamura Funding acquisition: Koihciro Kinugawa Writing – original draft: Teruhiko Imamura, Makiko Nakamura Writing – review and editing: Shigeki Yokoyama, Toshio Doi, Kazuaki Fukahara All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript. Teruhiko Imamura has full access to all of the data in this study and takes complete responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Teruhiko Imamura affirms that this manuscript is an honest, accurate, and transparent account of the study being reported, that no important aspects of the study have been omitted, and that any discrepancies from the study as planned have been explained. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Imamura et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Cardiogenic shock refractory to guideline-directed medical therapy requiring percutaneous LVAD (n=21). Elevated Ang-2/BNP ratio (> 2.7) vs. Low Ang-2/BNP ratio (≤ 2.7) was evaluated on Any occurrence of hemocompatibility-related adverse events (HRAEs) during LVAD support (adjusted HR 25.6, 95% CI 2.58-255, p=0.005). An elevated Ang-2/BNP ratio > 2.7 after percutaneous LVAD implantation was significantly associated with future hemocompatibility-related adverse events (adjusted HR 25.6; 95% CI 2.58-255).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: