Key result
Heart failure with high BNP linked to ~66% more bleeding events after PCI.
Why the study?
It was unknown whether left ventricular function or heart failure severity is associated with high bleeding risk post-PCI.
Does heart failure with high BNP increase the risk of major bleeding events in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention?
Observational (n=7,160)
Yes
Does heart failure with high BNP increase the risk of major bleeding events in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention?
Effect estimate: HR 1.66 (95% CI 1.10-2.50)
In patients undergoing PCI, heart failure with elevated BNP (≥100 pg/ml) is an independent predictor of future moderate-to-severe bleeding events and MACE.
High-BNP heart failure was associated with post-PCI bleeding independent of LVEF; hypothesis-generating for severity-stratified antithrombotic strategies.
Aims The Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) presents a bleeding risk assessment in antithrombotic therapy for patients post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In Japanese patients, heart failure (HF), peripheral vascular disease, and frailty are established as bleeding risk factors in addition to ARC-HBR. However, it is unknown whether left ventricular function or severity of HF is associated with HBR. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between the severity of HF measured by BNP and future bleeding events after PCI. Methods Clinical Deep Data Accumulation System (CLIDAS), a multicenter database with 7 tertiary medical hospitals in JAPAN, was developed to collect data directly for patient characteristics, medications, laboratory test, physiological test, cardiac catheterization and PCI treatment in electronic medical records using Standardized Structured Medical Information eXchange Extended Storage (SS-MIX). This retrospective analysis using CLIDAS database included 7160 patients who underwent PCI during April 2014 and March 2020 in the participating hospitals and also who have completed 3-year follow-up were divided into two groups: No HF (n=6645) and HF (n=515). HF patients were furthermore divided based on high BNP (≥100 pg/ml) group (n=384) and low BNP (<100 pg/ml) group (n=131). Primary outcome was defined as bleeding events according to the moderate and severe bleeding in the GUSTO classification. In addition, secondary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) defined as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infraction and stroke. Results Multivariable Cox regression adjusted for age, sex, BMI, acute coronary syndrome, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, chronic kidney disease, hemodialysis, previous PCI, previous coronary artery bypass grafting, prior myocardial infraction, prior stroke, prior atrial fibrillation, prior PVD, left main trunk disease, multivessel disease, and anticoagulants use showed that HF with high BNP was significantly associated with bleeding events (hazard ratio [HR], 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10–2.50), MACE (HR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.60–2.90), and all-cause death (HR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.30–2.33), but not HF with low BNP. Conclusions The CLIDAS real-world database revealed that HF with high BNP was associated with future bleeding events, suggesting that bleeding risk might be altered depending on severity of HF. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Otsuka et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Heart failure post percutaneous coronary intervention (n=7,160). Heart failure with high BNP (≥100 pg/ml) vs. No heart failure or heart failure with low BNP (<100 pg/ml) was evaluated on Bleeding events according to moderate and severe bleeding in the GUSTO classification (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.10-2.50). Heart failure with high BNP (≥100 pg/ml) was significantly associated with increased future bleeding events after PCI (HR 1.66; 95% CI 1.10-2.50).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: