1,3,6-Tri-O-galloyl-2,4-chebuloyl--D-glucopyranoside (chebulinic acid, 1) and its novel thricehydrolyzed derivative, 2,4-chebuloyl--D-glucopyranoside (galloyl-free chebulinic acid, 2), together with ellagic (3) and gallic acids (4), ethyl gallate (5), and luteolin (6), were isolated from the dried fruit of Terminalia chebula by bioactivity-guided fractionation of the extract. The compounds were variously identified on the basis of UV, MS, and NMR data. The latter proved that the glucose unit in 1 adopts a well defined 1 C 4 chair conformation with all substituents in axial positions. However, the absolute configurations of the three stereocenters in the chebuloyl group have been reassigned. For 2, a solvent-dependent mixture of both open-chain and cyclic pyranose forms was observed, the latter with a configuration for the anomeric C-1 sugar carbon being heavily preferred in aqueous solution. In contrast to 1, a dynamic equilibrium consisting of several possible skew conformers ( 5 S 1 , 1 S 5 , 1 S 3 , and 2 S O ) was designated for the sugar ring of 2. Antioxidant activities of the isolated compounds were assessed by measuring their ability to scavenge 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radicals and to inhibit the autoxidation of methyl linoleate in vitro. Of the isolated compounds, 1 showed the highest radical scavenging activity in the DPPH assay. For the methyl linoleate assay, 2 and 4-6 all exhibited strong antioxidant activities whereas the activities of 1 and 3 were only moderate. The fruit extract itself was highly effective in both tests.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Klika et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: