Key result
MitraClip implantation in patients with refractory heart failure and severe mitral regurgitation reduced cumulative HF hospitalization days from 280 pre-implantation to 10 post-procedure (p=0.023).
Why the study?
Does MitraClip implantation improve clinical outcomes and reduce heart failure hospitalizations in patients with refractory heart failure and mitral regurgitation ≥3+?
Observational (n=16)
No
Does MitraClip implantation improve clinical outcomes and reduce heart failure hospitalizations in patients with refractory heart failure and mitral regurgitation ≥3+?
MitraClip implantation in patients with refractory heart failure and severe mitral regurgitation may provide significant clinical benefits, facilitate weaning from hemodynamic support, and reduce heart failure hospitalizations.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May reduce HF hospitalizations in refractory cases; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation.
OBJECTIVES: To assess outcomes for MitraClip therapy in patients with refractory heart failure (HF) and mitral regurgitation (MR) ≥3+. BACKGROUND: The beneficial role of Mitraclip also in patients with severe HF has been reported. METHODS: Out of 45 patients undergoing MitraClip implantation at our institute, 16 were on refractory HF defined as diuretics and/or inotropics infusion and/or IABP dependence (group A) or labile haemodynamic balance (group B). RESULTS: Patients were aged 69 ± 13 years and 75% were males. Group A (8 patients) had a mean hospitalization length before MitraClip procedure of 5333 days. Group B (8 patients) had a mean rate of hospitalization, in the last 50 days before procedure, of 254 days. Acute procedural success was observed in 94% of patients. All but one patients of group A were quickly weaned from pharmacologic and/or mechanical supports within 5 ± 3 days from procedure and discharged at 20±10 days. All patients of group B were discharged after 10±8 days from MitraClip. At 1 year: a) cumulative survival rate was 78%; b) all patients were in NYHA functional class ≤ II; c) residual MR ≤ 2 was observed in 90%; d) systolic pulmonary arterial pressure was significantly reduced compared to the baseline (from 5410 to 398; p = 0,008); e) significant reduction of cumulative HF hospitalization days in the post-procedure year (10 days) compared to the pre-implantation year (280 days; p = 0.023) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with refractory HF and MR ≥3+, MitraClip implantation resulted in acute and persistent clinical benefit and net reduction of HF re-hospitalization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adamo et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Refractory heart failure and mitral regurgitation ≥3+ (n=16). MitraClip therapy vs. Pre-implantation baseline was evaluated on Cumulative heart failure hospitalization days (p=0.023). MitraClip implantation in patients with refractory heart failure and severe mitral regurgitation reduced cumulative HF hospitalization days from 280 pre-implantation to 10 post-procedure (p=0.023).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: