Key result
The proposed automatic algorithm matched expert manual detection for End-Systolic frames in all 12 patients, with minor differences in End-Diastolic frame selection in 3 patients resulting in negligible volume differences.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The proposed automatic algorithm accurately detects end-diastolic and end-systolic frames from 4D echocardiographic images, offering a time-saving alternative to manual expert assessment.
Accurate detection of the End-Diastolic (ED) and End-Systolic (ES) frames of a cardiac cycle are significant factors that may affect the accuracy of abnormality assessment of a ventricle. This process is a routine step of the ventricle assessment procedure as most of the time in clinical reports many parameters are measured in these two frames to help in diagnosing and dissection making. According to the previous works the process of detecting the ED and ES remains a challenge in that the ED and ES frames for the cavity are usually determined manually by review of individual image phases of the cavity and/or tracking the tricuspid valve. The proposed algorithm aims to automatically determine the ED and ES frames from the four Dimensional Echocardiographic images (4DE) of the Right Ventricle (RV) from one cardiac cycle. By computing the area of three slices along one cardiac cycle and selecting the maximum area as the ED frame and the minimum area as the ES frame. This method gives an accurate determination for the ED and ES frames, hence avoid the need for time consuming, expert contributions during the process of computing the cavity stroke volume.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abboud et al. (2015) studied Patients undergoing routine clinical echocardiographic assessment (n=12). Automatic detection algorithm for ED and ES frames vs. Manual detection by experts was evaluated on Matching of End-Systolic (ES) and End-Diastolic (ED) frames. The proposed automatic algorithm matched expert manual detection for End-Systolic frames in all 12 patients, with minor differences in End-Diastolic frame selection in 3 patients resulting in negligible volume differences.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: