Key result
In an experimental canine model of coronary stenosis, abundant coronary collaterals completely prevented tachycardia-induced ischemic ST-segment elevation, compared to significant ST-elevation (3.58 mV) in control dogs.
Why the study?
Do developed coronary collaterals prevent tachycardia-induced myocardial ischemia during partial coronary stenosis in dogs?
Do developed coronary collaterals prevent tachycardia-induced myocardial ischemia during partial coronary stenosis in dogs?
In a canine model of angina pectoris, abundant coronary collaterals provided sufficient blood supply to prevent tachycardia-induced myocardial ischemia during partial coronary stenosis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hypothesis-generating for collateral protection in stenosis; leaves open human translation and requires clinical studies.
This study was designed to determine whether coronary collaterals have preventive effects on tachycardia-induced myocardial ischemia under partial restriction of proximal coronary artery inflow. Studies were carried out in dogs with developed coronary collaterals and control dogs. ST-elevation in epicardial and intramyocardial electrograms was used for assessing the degree of regional myocardial ischemia. In control dogs with coronary constriction (80% reduction of i.d.) pacing-induced tachycardia produced significant ST-elevation, 1.48 +/- 0.17 mV in the inner layer and 0.79 +/- 0.29 mV in the middle layer at a cardiac rate of 150/min, 3.58 +/- 0.38 mV in the inner layer, 2.73 +/- 0.38 mV in the middle layer, and 1.93 +/- 0.36 mV in the outer layer at a rate of 180/min. In dogs with moderate collaterals ST-segment elevation was only 1.41 +/- 0.18 mV in the inner layer and 0.96 +/- 0.24 mV in the middle layer at a rate of 180/min. In dogs with abundant collaterals there was no significant ST-elevation during tachycardia. These findings indicate that blood supply to the affected myocardium via developed collaterals is sufficient to meet graded increases in metabolic requirements under the condition of limited coronary flow reserve in an experimental model simulating angina pectoris.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sakamoto et al. (1983) studied Tachycardia-induced myocardial ischemia during coronary stenosis (n=29). Developed coronary collaterals (via chronic ameroid constriction) vs. Poor collaterals (control dogs) was evaluated on ST-segment elevation in the inner myocardial layer during pacing-induced tachycardia at 180 beats/min. In an experimental canine model of coronary stenosis, abundant coronary collaterals completely prevented tachycardia-induced ischemic ST-segment elevation, compared to significant ST-elevation (3.58 mV) in control dogs.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: