Why the study?
Does orifice-view aortography accurately determine aortic valve area compared to hydraulic or direct measurements in patients with congenitally deformed aortic valves?
Does orifice-view aortography accurately determine aortic valve area compared to hydraulic or direct measurements in patients with congenitally deformed aortic valves?
Orifice-view aortography provides an accurate alternative for measuring aortic valve area in patients with congenitally deformed valves, especially when hydraulic measurements are not feasible.
May support orifice-view aortography for aortic valve area assessment; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
Orifice-view aortography is a contrast cineaortographic technique that allows en face viewing of the aortic valve. In this projection the anatomic configuration of the aortic valve is identified, and it is possible to planimeterize the visualized aortic valve opening and accurately determine the orifice area. Fifteen individuals with congenitally deformed aortic valves with gradients ranging from trivial (< 10 mm Hg) to surgically significant (6E 60 mm Hg) were subjected to aortic orifice area measurement by orifice-view aortography, and the area was compared with the peak systolic gradient and valve area. The results yielded a cloe correlation with the aortic valve area index as measured hydraulically or, as in three instances, directly from the surgically excised specimen (r = 0.94). A satisfactory correlation was also shown with the valve area index and the peak aortic valve gradient (r = 0.85). These observations indicate that orifice-view aortography is an accurate method for the measurement of the aortic valve orifice and may be particularly useful when hydraulic measurements are unattainable or invalid.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Folger et al. (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: