Key result
The histamine-induced axon-reflex flare response is a valid marker for small fiber neuropathy, yielding an AUC of 0.82, sensitivity of 67%, and specificity of 70%.
Why the study?
Diabetic peripheral neuropathy affects small nerve fibers early, but adequate evaluation has proven difficult.
Does the histamine-induced axon-reflex flare response accurately assess small nerve fiber function compared to quantitative sensory testing in people with type 1 diabetes?
Cross-Sectional (n=34)
Does the histamine-induced axon-reflex flare response accurately assess small nerve fiber function compared to quantitative sensory testing in people with type 1 diabetes?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.82
The histamine-induced axon-reflex flare response is a valid marker for small fiber neuropathy in patients with type 1 diabetes.
Histamine-induced ARF may support small-fiber evaluation in unselected diabetes; leaves open routine adoption pending larger prospective studies.
Introduction/Aims Diabetic peripheral neuropathy affects small nerve fibers early, but adequate evaluation has proven difficult. One method for functional assessment of small nerve fiber function is the axon‐reflex flare (ARF) response. This study aimed to 1) validate the histamine‐induced ARF response in a nonselected population with diabetes, 2) compare the response to that induced by local heating, and 3) compare both methods to an established method (quantitative sensory testing) in a nonselected population with diabetes. Methods Thirty‐four participants with type 1 diabetes were included. The participants underwent a neurological examination, quantitative sensory testing, sural nerve conduction, and histamine‐ and heat‐induced ARF response measurements by full‐field laser speckle perfusion imaging after epidermal application of histamine and after local heating by 44° Celsius thermode, respectively. Spearman's correlations were assessed. Logistic regression was used to generate receiver operating characteristic curves using the cold detection threshold of quantitative sensory testing as reference. Results The histamine‐induced ARF had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.82, a sensitivity of 67%, and a specificity of 70%. The heat‐induced ARF had an AUC of 0.40, a sensitivity of 36%, and a specificity of 57%. No significant correlation between the histamine‐ and the heat‐induced ARF responses was found. Discussion The histamine‐induced ARF response is a valid marker for small fiber neuropathy even in nonselected populations with diabetes with good agreement with established markers and can thus be used for evaluation of C‐fiber function. The lack of correlation with the heat‐induced ARF may be due to insufficient heating.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tind et al. (2024) conducted a cross-sectional in Type 1 diabetes (n=34). Histamine-induced axon-reflex flare (ARF) response vs. Heat-induced ARF response was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy (AUC, sensitivity, specificity) using cold detection threshold as reference (AUC 0.82). The histamine-induced axon-reflex flare response is a valid marker for small fiber neuropathy, yielding an AUC of 0.82, sensitivity of 67%, and specificity of 70%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: