Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The CREAMS (Chemical, Runoff, and Erosion from Agricultural Management Systems) field-scale model is used to evaluate the effectiveness of grass filter strips for erosion control. Simulations are presented for filter strips of several widths (3-15 m), slopes (2.4–10%), and grass stand qualities (Manning's n, 0.023–0.46) on a 1.6 ha wheatland watershed in the Reddish Prairie land resource area. Filter strip effectiveness is dependent upon strip width, Manning's n, slope and slope configuration, and storm intensity. For 2.4% slopes with a concave-convex, concave, or uniform configuration, a filter strip 15 m (50 feet) wide with a good grass stand (Manning's n of 0.46) reduced soil loss 29%, 26%, and 33 %, respectively. A 2.4% convex slope presented the worst general condition for filter strip use, although a 15-m wide filter strip with a good grass stand could reduce soil loss as much as 46%. Results indicate that CREAMS can be a useful tool for evaluating filter strip effectiveness in reducing sediment yield.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Williams et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: