In vivo arteriolar vasomotion is driven by spontaneous, cyclic changes in the membrane potential of smooth muscle and endothelial cells.
Does not inform clinical vasomotion management; leaves open mechanistic validation in human vessels.
We tested the hypothesis that cyclic changes in membrane potential (E(m)) underlie spontaneous vasomotion in cheek pouch arterioles of anesthetized hamsters. Diameter oscillations (approximately 3 min(-1)) were preceded (approximately 3 s) by oscillations in E(m) of smooth muscle cells (SMC) and endothelial cells (EC). Oscillations in E(m) were resolved into six phases: (1) a period (6 +/- 2 s) at the most negative E(m) observed during vasomotion (-46 +/- 2 mV) correlating (r = 0.87, p < 0.01) with time (8 +/- 2 s) at the largest diameter observed during vasomotion (41 +/- 2 microm); (2) a slow depolarization (1.8 +/- 0.2 mV s(-1)) with no diameter change; (3) a fast (9.1 +/- 0.8 mV s(-1)) depolarization (to -28 +/- 2 mV) and constriction; (4) a transient partial repolarization (3-4 mV); (5) a sustained (5 +/- 1 s) depolarization (-28 +/- 2 mV) correlating (r = 0.78, p < 0.01) with time (3 +/- 1 s) at the smallest diameter (27 +/- 2 microm) during vasomotion; (6) a slow repolarization (2.5 +/- 0.2 mV s(-1)) and relaxation. The absolute change in E(m) correlated (r = 0.60, p < 0.01) with the most negative E(m). Sodium nitroprusside or nifedipine caused sustained hyperpolarization and dilation, whereas tetraethylammonium or elevated PO(2) caused sustained depolarization and constriction. We suggest that vasomotion in vivo reflects spontaneous, cyclic changes in E(m) of SMC and EC corresponding with cation fluxes across plasma membranes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bartlett et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: