Key result
Acute isometric handgrip exercise increased spontaneous cardiac baroreflex sensitivity during 10 minutes of recovery, with a significantly greater increase in women (Δ23% ± 4%) than in men (Δ13% ± 5%; P=0.04).
Why the study?
Does acute isometric handgrip exercise affect spontaneous cardiac baroreflex sensitivity differently in healthy young men and women?
RCT (n=40)
Randomized
Does acute isometric handgrip exercise affect spontaneous cardiac baroreflex sensitivity differently in healthy young men and women?
p-value: p=0.04
Acute isometric handgrip exercise increases cardiac baroreflex sensitivity and vagal activity in healthy young subjects, with women showing a greater magnitude and longer duration of cBRS elevation compared to men.
Supports sex-specific autonomic interpretations post-exercise; extends RCT evidence on baroreflex modulation in healthy adults.
PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate potential sex-related differences on spontaneous cardiac baroreflex sensitivity (cBRS) after acute isometric handgrip (IHG) exercise. METHODS: Twenty men (age, 23 ± 3 yr) and 20 women (age, 24 ± 4 yr) randomly performed four sets of 2-min IHG exercise (two sets for each limb) at 30% maximal voluntary contraction (experimental) or 3% maximal voluntary contraction (sham). Beat-to-beat heart rate (HR) and arterial blood pressure (BP) were monitored using finger photoplethysmography before and 10, 20, and 30 min after IHG. Spontaneous cBRS was assessed via the sequence technique and cardiac autonomic modulation via time- and frequency-domain HR variability. RESULTS: After IHG, spontaneous cBRS increased during 10 min of recovery in men (Δ13% ± 5%, P = 0.03 vs rest) and increased further in women (Δ23% ± 4%, P < 0.01 vs rest; P = 0.04 vs men). During 20 and 30 min of recovery, cBRS returned to baseline in men but remained elevated in women. HR decreased 10 min after IHG in men (10 min: Δ-2 ± 1 bpm, P < 0.01 vs rest; 20 min: Δ-1 ± 1 bpm, P = 0.39 vs rest; 30 min: Δ1 ± 1 bpm, P = 0.31 vs rest) and throughout recovery in women (10 min: Δ-5 ± 1 bpm, P < 0.01 vs rest; 20 min: Δ-3 ± 1 bpm, P < 0.01 vs rest; 30 min: Δ-2 ± 1 bpm, P < 0.01 vs rest). Systolic BP increased 10 min after IHG and remained elevated during 20 min and 30 min in men (P < 0.05). In women, systolic BP increased during 10 min (P < 0.01) and returned to baseline during 20 and 30 min of recovery. Time-domain HR variability (root mean square of successive differences) was increased during recovery in men and women (P < 0.05). Sham had no effect on any variables. CONCLUSIONS: Acute IHG exercise increases cBRS and cardiac vagal activity in healthy young subjects, but the magnitude and the time course of changes in cBRS differ between men and women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Teixeira et al. (2017) conducted an RCT in Healthy (n=40). Isometric handgrip (IHG) exercise vs. Sham (3% maximal voluntary contraction) was evaluated on Spontaneous cardiac baroreflex sensitivity (cBRS) (p=0.04). Acute isometric handgrip exercise increased spontaneous cardiac baroreflex sensitivity during 10 minutes of recovery, with a significantly greater increase in women (Δ23% ± 4%) than in men (Δ13% ± 5%; P=0.04).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: