Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction There has been a lack of psychometrically sound instruments in Finnish for assessment of mobility after major lower-limb amputation. This study aimed to translate the Locomotor Capabilities Index-5 (LCI-5) into Finnish and assess its psychometric properties. Materials and Methods The LCI-5 was translated and cross-culturally adapted into Finnish. Lower-limb prosthesis users (N = 112, mean time since amputation 9 years) completed the questionnaire compilation twice in a 2-week interval. Results No semantic discord emerged during the translation process. The mean (SD) total LCI-5 score was 42 (15), and intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93–0.96). Cronbach's alpha was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.95–0.97). Item-to-total correlations varied between 0.70 and 0.88. The LCI-5 correlated strongly with the 15D Mobility dimension ( r = 0.76; P < 0.01), Houghton scale ( r = 0.78; P < 0,001), and the Mobility section of the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (0.70; P < 0.001). The LCI-5 discriminated between transtibial and transfemoral amputation groups and had a moderate correlation with patients' age. Maximum scores were reached by 24% of the respondents. Conclusions Based on the findings of the present study, the Finnish LCI-5 has good reliability and validity for assessing mobility in patients who have undergone major lower-limb amputation and successful prosthesis fitting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Repo et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: