Key result
Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic adults had higher rates of poor cardiometabolic risk profiles (15% and 11%, respectively) compared to non-Hispanic Whites (9%) across income and insurance levels.
Why the study?
Racial and ethnic disparities in cumulative cardiometabolic risk profile by insurance type and income level had not been investigated on a national scale.
Do racial/ethnic minorities experience greater cardiometabolic burden at each income level and insurance type compared to non-Hispanic Whites?
Cross-Sectional (n=134,661)
Yes
Do racial/ethnic minorities experience greater cardiometabolic burden at each income level and insurance type compared to non-Hispanic Whites?
Absolute Event Rate: 15% vs 9%
Racial and ethnic minorities experience worse cardiometabolic risk profiles across all levels of income and insurance compared to non-Hispanic Whites, highlighting disparities not fully explained by socioeconomic status.
Disparities in poor CMB profile persist across income and insurance for NHB and Hispanics; leaves open unmeasured determinants including structural racism.
CONTEXT: Income and health insurance are important social determinants of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and may explain much racial/ethnic variation in CVD burden. However, racial/ethnic disparities in cumulative cardiometabolic (CMB) risk profile by insurance type and income level have not been studied on a national scale. OBJECTIVES: To test the hypothesis that racial/ethnic minorities experience greater CMB burden at each income level and insurance type than non-Hispanic Whites (NHW). SETTING: This study used nationally representative data from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). DESIGN: Observational (cross-sectional). PARTICIPANTS: In total, 134661 (weighted N = 197780611) adults, 18 years or older, from the 2013-2017 NHIS. PRIMARY OUTCOME: CMB risk profile. INTERVENTION/ANALYSIS: Age-adjusted prevalence of optimal, average, and poor CMB risk profile-defined respectively as self-report of 0, 1-2, and 3 or more risk factors of diabetes, hypertension, obesity, or hypercholesterolemia-was examined for NHW, non-Hispanic Blacks (NHB), and Hispanics. Multivariable ordinal logistic regression models were used to test the association between race and ethnicity and CMB profile overall and separately by household income level and insurance type. RESULTS: Overall, 15% of NHB and 11% of Hispanics experienced poor CMB risk profile, compared with 9% for NHW. In fully adjusted models, NHB and Hispanics, respectively had nearly 25%-90% and 10%-30% increased odds of poor CMB profile across insurance types and 45%-60% and 15%-30% increased odds of poor CMB profile across income levels, relative to NHW. The observed disparities were widest for the Medicare group (NHB: OR = 1.90; Hispanics: OR = 1.31) and highest-income level (NHB: OR = 1.62). CONCLUSIONS: Racial/ethnic minorities experience poor CMB profile at each level of income and insurance. These findings point to the need for greater investigation of unmeasured determinants of minority cardiovascular (CV) health, including structural racism and implicit bias in CV care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2021 study conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiometabolic risk (n=134,661). Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic race/ethnicity vs. Non-Hispanic White race/ethnicity was evaluated on Poor cardiometabolic risk profile (≥3 risk factors). Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic adults had higher rates of poor cardiometabolic risk profiles (15% and 11%, respectively) compared to non-Hispanic Whites (9%) across income and insurance levels.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: