Key result
Retinal AI model plus clinical factors identifies subclinical atherosclerosis with an AUC of 0.86.
Why the study?
Current cardiovascular risk scores may underestimate risk, particularly in younger individuals, whereas imaging-based detection of subclinical atherosclerosis provides more accurate assessment.
Does AI-based retinal image analysis accurately detect subclinical atherosclerosis in adults without prior cardiovascular disease?
Observational (n=931)
No
Does AI-based retinal image analysis accurately detect subclinical atherosclerosis in adults without prior cardiovascular disease?
AI-based analysis of non-mydriatic retinal images provides a scalable, non-invasive method to detect subclinical atherosclerosis, potentially improving early cardiovascular risk stratification.
May support scalable screening; hypothesis-generating pending prospective outcome validation.
Aims Current cardiovascular risk scores may underestimate the risk of future cardiovascular events, particularly in younger individuals with prolonged exposure to risk factors. In contrast, imaging-based detection of subclinical atherosclerosis provides a more accurate assessment of cardiovascular risk by identifying established vascular disease. We aimed to develop and prospectively validate an artificial intelligence–based tool using retinal fundus images to detect ultrasound-confirmed subclinical atherosclerosis. Methods and results In this prospective observational study, 931 participants (mean age 52.6 years; 70.2% women) without prior cardiovascular disease underwent standardized clinical evaluation, non-mydriatic retinal imaging, and carotid and femoral ultrasound to detect subclinical atherosclerosis. A multimodal AI model integrating deep learning from retinal images with radiomic and clinical data was developed in a derivation cohort (n = 781) and evaluated in a held-out prospective test set (n = 150). Subclinical atherosclerosis was present in 50.8% of participants. In the prospective test set, the AI model demonstrated good discrimination. In image-only mode, the model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.80 (95% CI 0.73–0.87), with sensitivity of 88.2%. In the enhanced mode incorporating clinical variables, performance improved to an AUC of 0.86 (95% CI 0.80–0.92), with sensitivity of 93.4% and a negative predictive value of 90.6%. Discrimination was higher in younger individuals and those at low-to-intermediate cardiovascular risk. Conclusion AI-based retinal image analysis enables non-invasive detection of systemic subclinical atherosclerosis. This scalable approach may enhance early identification of high cardiovascular-risk patients, particularly in populations in whom risk is underestimated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Torres‐Macho et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Without prior cardiovascular disease (n=931). AI-based retinal image analysis (Aitheroscope) vs. Vascular ultrasound was evaluated on Model discrimination (AUC) for detecting subclinical atherosclerosis (AUC 0.86, 95% CI 0.80-0.92). An enhanced artificial intelligence model incorporating retinal images and clinical variables detected ultrasound-confirmed subclinical atherosclerosis with an AUC of 0.86.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: