Key result
AI retinal biomarker detects coronary atherosclerosis on CCTA with ~94% sensitivity but poor specificity.
Why the study?
The cross-sectional performance of an AI-based retinal image biomarker against current coronary imaging markers of atherosclerosis required evaluation in independent populations.
Does an AI-based retinal cardiovascular risk biomarker accurately detect imaging-defined coronary atherosclerosis on CCTA in a Greek cohort?
Cross-Sectional (n=1,233)
Does an AI-based retinal cardiovascular risk biomarker accurately detect imaging-defined coronary atherosclerosis on CCTA in a Greek cohort?
An AI-based retinal biomarker shows high sensitivity (92–96.3%) and moderate discrimination (AUC 0.719–0.737), though low specificity, for detecting subclinical coronary atherosclerosis on CCTA, supporting its potential as a non-invasive rule-out or initial risk-stratification tool.
Background Artificial intelligence (AI) based retinal image analysis has been developed as a non-invasive biomarker for prediction of future cardiovascular risk. Its cross-sectional performance against current coronary imaging markers of atherosclerosis requires evaluation in independent populations. Purpose To assess the cross-sectional association between an AI-derived retinal cardiovascular risk biomarker and coronary atherosclerosis defined by Coronary Artery Calcium (CAC), Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) classification, and plaque burden on Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) in a Greek population. Methods In a cohort of 1,233 individuals undergoing CCTA, same-day retinal photographs were analysed to generate categorical cardiovascular risk groups (low, moderate, high) using the AI-based retinal biomarker. Although designed for future risk prediction, performance was evaluated cross-sectionally by comparing low retinal risk versus combined moderate or high retinal risk for detection of coronary atherosclerosis on CCTA. Sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), and discrimination using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated for CAC >0, CAD-RADS >0 and plaque burden ≥2. Results Median age was 54 years and 66.1% were male. The proportion classified as high risk by the AI-derived retinal biomarker increased across CAC categories, from 28.5% in CAC 0 to 54.2% in CAC 1–99 and 71.1% in CAC ≥100. A similar gradient was observed across CAD-RADS categories, with high retinal risk in 27.6% of CAD-RADS 0, 49.7% of CAD-RADS 1, 68.6% of CAD-RADS 2, 64.5% of CAD-RADS 3, and 69.2% of CAD-RADS 4–5. Likewise, as plaque burden severity increased, a greater proportion of individuals were classified as high retinal risk. Performance for detection of CAC >0 was SN 94%, SP 25.7%, AUC 0.737. For CAD-RADS >0, SN 92%, SP 26.9%, AUC 0.719. For plaque burden ≥2, SN 96.3%, SP 21.2%, AUC 0.727. Conclusions An AI-based retinal biomarker developed for future cardiovascular risk prediction demonstrates high sensitivity with low specificity for cross-sectional detection of imaging-defined coronary atherosclerosis in a Greek population. Consistent retinal risk gradients across CAC, CAD-RADS, and plaque burden indicate concordance with coronary disease severity and support its potential role as a non-invasive risk-stratification tool to guide further cardiovascular evaluation. Prospective studies are needed to establish its clinical utility within preventive care pathways.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Papadopoulou et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Coronary atherosclerosis (n=1,233). AI-derived retinal cardiovascular risk biomarker (moderate or high risk) vs. Low retinal risk group was evaluated on Cross-sectional detection of coronary atherosclerosis on CCTA (CAC >0, CAD-RADS >0, and plaque burden ≥2) (AUC 0.737 (CAC >0), AUC 0.719 (CAD-RADS >0), AUC 0.727 (plaque burden ≥2)). An AI-based retinal biomarker showed high sensitivity (92%-96.3%) and moderate discrimination (AUC 0.719-0.737) but low specificity (21.2%-26.9%) for detecting coronary atherosclerosis on CCTA.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: