Key result
CVD-AI generates ~2-fold higher 10-year risk scores for patients who experience CVD events.
Why the study?
The study sought to create and evaluate an artificial intelligence platform (CVD-AI) using only retinal fundus images to predict overall 10-year CVD risk and the contribution of component risk factors.
Does an artificial intelligence platform (CVD-AI) using retinal fundus images accurately predict 10-year cardiovascular disease risk?
Observational (n=55,118)
Yes
Does an artificial intelligence platform (CVD-AI) using retinal fundus images accurately predict 10-year cardiovascular disease risk?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports retinal AI for CVD risk stratification; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Purpose To create and evaluate the accuracy of an artificial intelligence platform capable of using only retinal fundus images to predict both an individual ’ s overall 10 year Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) risk and the relative contribution of the component risk factors that comprise this risk (CVD-AI). Methods The UK Biobank and the US-based AREDS 1 datasets were obtained and used for this study. The UK Biobank data was used for training, validation and testing, while the AREDS 1 dataset was used as an external testing dataset. Overall, we used 110,272 fundus images from 55,118 patient visits. A series of models were trained to predict the risk of CVD against available labels in the UK Biobank dataset. Results In both the UK Biobank testing dataset and the external validation dataset (AREDS 1), the 10-year CV risk scores generated by CVD-AI were significantly higher for patients who had suffered an actual CVD event when compared to patients who did not experience a CVD event. In the UK Biobank dataset the median 10-year CVD risk for those individuals who experienced a CVD was higher than those who did not (4.9% [ICR 2.9-8%] v 2.3% [IQR 4.3-1.3%] P<0.01.]. Similar results were observed in the AREDS 1 dataset The median 10-year CVD risk for those individuals who experienced a CVD event was higher than those who did not (6.2% [ICR 3.2%-12.9%] v 2.2% [IQR 3.9-1.3%] P<0.01 Conclusion Retinal photography is inexpensive and as fully automated, inexpensive camera systems are now widely available, minimal training is required to acquire them. As such, AI enabled retinal image-based CVD risk algorithms like CVD-AI will make cardiovascular health screening more affordable and accessible. CVD-AI ’ s unique ability to assess the relative contribution of the components that comprise an individual ’ s overall risk could inform personalized treatment decisions based on the specific needs of an individual, thereby increasing the likelihood of positive health outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vaghefi et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Cardiovascular Disease Risk (n=55,118). CVD-AI (Artificial intelligence platform on retinal images) vs. Patients who did not experience a CVD event was evaluated on Median 10-year CVD risk score generated by CVD-AI for individuals who experienced a CVD event versus those who did not (UK Biobank dataset) (p=<0.01). The CVD-AI deep learning model generated significantly higher median 10-year cardiovascular risk scores for individuals who experienced a CVD event compared to those who did not (4.9% vs 2.3%, p<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: