Key result
The presence of local infection (OR 11.2) and shorter lead dwell time (OR 0.63 per year) were independent predictors of successful simple manual traction for coronary venous lead removal.
Why the study?
With increasing numbers of patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy, the frequency of coronary venous lead removal and reimplantation due to infection or malfunction has risen.
Cohort (n=34)
No
Coronary venous lead removal is safe and highly successful, with simple traction often sufficient for leads with shorter dwell times or local infection, though reimplantation frequently requires a right-sided approach due to venous occlusion.
CV lead extraction feasible in small infected cohort; leaves open need for larger prospective safety data on reimplantation.
BACKGROUND: The number of patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy has increased. Consequently, there is increased frequency in the removal and reimplantation of coronary venous (CV) leads due to infection or malfunction. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 345 consecutive patients referred for lead(s) extraction were reviewed. Of these, 34 patients who underwent a CV lead removal were investigated. The indications for CV leads removal were device-related infections in 29 patients and lead malfunctions in 5 patients. The average duration of the CV leads was 4.1±3.8 years. All CV leads were successfully removed without any major complications, except for 1 in-hospital death. Successful CV lead removal by simple traction (ST) was achieved in 21 patients (62%), whereas extraction tools were required in 13 patients (38%). Local infection and CV lead dwell time were significantly associated with successful ST (P=0.04 and P=0.014, respectively). CV lead re-implantation was successfully performed in 25 patients; however, a right-side approach was required in 92%, and occlusion/stenosis of the previous CV was observed in 80% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: CV lead removal is relatively successful and safe. The presence of local infection and a shorter lead duration may enable successful ST of a CV lead. However, the re-implantation procedure should be well prepared for the complexity related to the right-side approach and occlusion/stenosis of the previous CV.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yagishita et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Cardiac resynchronization therapy device infection or malfunction requiring lead removal (n=34). Local infection vs. Absence of local infection was evaluated on Successful simple manual traction for coronary venous lead removal (OR 11.2, 95% CI 1.42-180.23, p=0.04). The presence of local infection (OR 11.2) and shorter lead dwell time (OR 0.63 per year) were independent predictors of successful simple manual traction for coronary venous lead removal.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: