Key result
Bicuspid aortic valve was associated with a lower prevalence of coronary artery disease than tricuspid aortic valve (OR 0.33; 95% CI 0.17-0.65), but this difference was driven by age and diabetes.
Why the study?
Does bicuspid aortic valve morphology compared to tricuspid aortic valve morphology affect the prevalence of coronary artery disease in patients undergoing aortic valve surgery?
Meta-Analysis (n=7,603)
Does bicuspid aortic valve morphology compared to tricuspid aortic valve morphology affect the prevalence of coronary artery disease in patients undergoing aortic valve surgery?
Odds Ratio: 0.33 (95% CI 0.17–0.65)
The apparent lower prevalence of coronary artery disease in patients with bicuspid aortic valves compared to tricuspid aortic valves is driven by differences in age and diabetes rather than valve morphology itself.
CAD risk in aortic valve surgery patients should prioritize age and diabetes over valve morphology; challenges morphology-specific assumptions and supports adjusted analyses.
BACKGROUND: Literature studies suggested a lower prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) than in tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) patients. However, this finding has been challenged. We performed a meta-analysis to assess whether aortic valve morphology has a different association with CAD, concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), and postoperative mortality. METHODS AND RESULTS: Detailed search was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guideline to identify all patients with BAV or TAV and presence of CAD, concomitant myocardial surgical revascularization, and the postoperative mortality. Thirty-one studies on 3017 BAV and 4586 TAV patients undergoing aortic valve surgery were included. BAV patients showed a lower prevalence of CAD (odds ratio [OR]: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.17, 0.65), concomitant CABG (OR, 0.45; 95% CI: 0.35, 0.59), and postoperative mortality (OR, 0.62; 95% CI: 0.40, 0.97) than TAV. However, BAV subjects were significantly younger than TAV (mean difference: -7.29; 95% CI: -11.17, -3.41) were more frequently males (OR, 1.61; 95% CI: 1.33, 1.94) and exhibited a lower prevalence of hypertension (OR, 0.58; 95% CI: 0.39, 0.87) and diabetes (OR, 0.71; 95% CI: 0.54, 0.93). Interestingly, a metaregression analysis showed that younger age and lower prevalence of diabetes were associated with lower prevalence of CAD (Z value: -3.03; P=0.002 and Z value: -3.10; P=0.002, respectively) and CABG (Z value: -2.69; P=0.007 and Z value: -3.36; P=0.001, respectively) documented in BAV patients. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of raw data suggested an association of aortic valve morphology with prevalence of CAD, concomitant CABG, and postoperative mortality. Interestingly, the differences in age and diabetes have a profound impact on prevalence of CAD between BAV and TAV. In conclusion, our meta-analysis suggests that the presence of CAD is independent of aortic valve morphology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Poggio et al. (2016) conducted a meta-analysis in Aortic valve surgery (n=7,603). Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) vs. Tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) was evaluated on Prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.17, 0.65). Bicuspid aortic valve was associated with a lower prevalence of coronary artery disease than tricuspid aortic valve (OR 0.33; 95% CI 0.17-0.65), but this difference was driven by age and diabetes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: