Definitions for the terms collapse resistance and robustness are proposed. Based on an analysis of the shortcomings of current design methods, a pragmatic approach for designing against progressive collapse is suggested and a set of design criteria is presented. Design strategies based on preventing or presuming local failure are compared. Furthermore, the alternate-load-paths approach is compared with the compartmentalization approach concerning their applicability to different types of structures and design objectives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Uwe Starossek (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: