Key result
An intravenous test dose of 10 ml bupivacaine 0.125% with 12.5 μg epinephrine detected inadvertent intravascular injection with 100% specificity and 97.5% sensitivity by the primary investigator.
Why the study?
Does 10 ml bupivacaine 0.125% with 12.5 μg epinephrine accurately detect inadvertent intravascular injection in obstetric patients?
RCT (n=40)
Double-blind
Does 10 ml bupivacaine 0.125% with 12.5 μg epinephrine accurately detect inadvertent intravascular injection in obstetric patients?
A 10 ml test dose of bupivacaine 0.125% with 12.5 μg epinephrine is highly sensitive and specific for detecting inadvertent intravascular injection in obstetric patients.
Supports routine use of this test dose in obstetric epidurals; reinforces diagnostic reliability with RCT evidence.
A double-blind study was designed in order to determine the specificity and sensitivity of an epidural test dose to detect inadvertent intravenous injection in obstetric patients undergoing epidural analgesia. Forty unselected obstetric patients were given an intravenous injection of 10 ml bupivacaine 0.125% with 12.5 micrograms epinephrine (test dose) or 10 ml normal physiologic saline. The maternal heart rate was monitored by the direct ECG mode of a fetal monitor and registered simultaneously with the tocogram. The primary investigator was blinded to the solution he injected into an antecubital vein. After the injection was given, he recorded his judgment of which solution he had administered. Eight other anesthesiologists made similar judgments on the basis of the recordings plus various levels of additional information (presence or absence of epidural analgesia, time of injection, subjective signs and symptoms). In contrast to the primary investigator, the blood pressure values were not given to them. For the primary investigator, the specificity of the test dose was 100% and the sensitivity 97.5%. The judgments of the 8 other anesthesiologists resulted in an excellent specificity (99.1%) and a good sensitivity (91.9% with information on time of injection and subjective signs and symptoms). The better performance of the primary investigator is probably due to the availability of blood pressure data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gieraerts et al. (1992) conducted an RCT in obstetric patients undergoing epidural analgesia (n=40). bupivacaine 0.125% with epinephrine vs. 10 ml normal physiologic saline was evaluated on specificity and sensitivity to detect inadvertent intravenous injection. An intravenous test dose of 10 ml bupivacaine 0.125% with 12.5 μg epinephrine detected inadvertent intravascular injection with 100% specificity and 97.5% sensitivity by the primary investigator.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: